ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Deep Learning Model for Classifying Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression on MRI.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Detection and Characterisation of Bone Metastases on MRI: A Scoping Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Clinical applications of MRI-based artificial intelligence in spinal metastases: A systematic review.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Review
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Preprocessing for Robust Spinal Cord Segmentation in Cervical Myelopathy.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the NOVA score for surgical triage in metastatic spinal cord compression.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Current Trends and Future Prospects of Radiomics and Machine Learning (ML) Models in Spinal Tumors-A Narrative Review.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Outcomes in Spinal Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in bone Metastases: A systematic review in guideline adherence of 92 studies.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Review
- Patterns of Treatment Delay in Patients with Symptomatic Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression.Cancers · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Spine MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Recent Outcomes and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in Neurosurgery.World neurosurgery: X · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for Osteoporosis Classification Using Computed Tomography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A deep learning-based technique for the diagnosis of epidural spinal cord compression on thoracolumbar CT.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023Article
- Deep learning assessment compared to radiologist reporting for metastatic spinal cord compression on CT.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in oncologic emergencies: a narrative review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is a devastating complication of advanced cancer. A deep learning (DL) model for automated MESCC classification on MRI could aid earlier diagnosis and referral. Purpose: To develop a DL model for automated classification of MESCC on MRI. Materials and Methods: Patients with known MESCC diagnosed on MRI between September 2007 and September 2017 were eligible. MRI studies with instrumentation, suboptimal image quality, and non-thoracic regions were excluded. Axial T2-weighted images were utilized. The internal dataset split was 82% and 18% for training/validation and test sets, respectively. External testing was also performed. Internal training/validation data were labeled using the Bilsky MESCC classification by a musculoskeletal radiologist (10-year experience) and a neuroradiologist (5-year experience). These labels were used to train a DL model utilizing a prototypical convolutional neural network. Internal and external test sets were labeled by the musculoskeletal radiologist as the reference standard. For assessment of DL model performance and interobserver variability, test sets were labeled independently by the neuroradiologist (5-year experience), a spine surgeon (5-year experience), and a radiation oncologist (11-year experience). Inter-rater agreement (Gwet's kappa) and sensitivity/specificity were calculated. Results: Overall, 215 MRI spine studies were analyzed [164 patients, mean age = 62 ± 12(SD)] with 177 (82%) for training/validation and 38 (18%) for internal testing. For internal testing, the DL model and specialists all showed almost perfect agreement (kappas = 0.92-0.98, p < 0.001) for dichotomous Bilsky classification (low versus high grade) compared to the reference standard. Similar performance was seen for external testing on a set of 32 MRI spines with the DL model and specialists all showing almost perfect agreement (kappas = 0.94-0.95, p < 0.001) compared to the reference standard. Conclusion: A DL model showed comparable agreement to a subspecialist radiologist and clinical specialists for the classification of malignant epidural spinal cord compression and could optimize earlier diagnosis and surgical referral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.