Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600347›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Deep Learning Model for Classifying Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression on MRI.

James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Lei Zhu, Wenqiao Zhang, Desmond Shi Wei Lim, Sangeetha Baskar, Xi Zhen Low, Kuan Yuen Yeong, Ee Chin Teo, Nesaretnam Barr Kumarakulasinghe, Qai Ven Yap and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Development and validation of the NOVA score for surgical triage in metastatic spinal cord compression.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. A deep learning-based technique for the diagnosis of epidural spinal cord compression on thoracolumbar CT.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

James Thomas Patrick Decourcy HallinanDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Lei ZhuNUS Graduate School, Integrative Sciences and Engineering Programme, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Wenqiao ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Desmond Shi Wei LimDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Sangeetha BaskarDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Xi Zhen LowDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Kuan Yuen YeongDepartment of Radiology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Ee Chin TeoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Nesaretnam Barr KumarakulasingheNational University Cancer Institute, NUH Medical Centre (NUHMC), Singapore, Singapore.
Qai Ven YapBiostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore.
Yiong Huak ChanBiostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore.
Shuxun LinDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jiong Hao TanUniversity Spine Centre, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Naresh KumarUniversity Spine Centre, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Balamurugan A VellayappanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Beng Chin OoiDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Swee Tian QuekDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Andrew MakmurDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is a devastating complication of advanced cancer. A deep learning (DL) model for automated MESCC classification on MRI could aid earlier diagnosis and referral. Purpose: To develop a DL model for automated classification of MESCC on MRI. Materials and Methods: Patients with known MESCC diagnosed on MRI between September 2007 and September 2017 were eligible. MRI studies with instrumentation, suboptimal image quality, and non-thoracic regions were excluded. Axial T2-weighted images were utilized. The internal dataset split was 82% and 18% for training/validation and test sets, respectively. External testing was also performed. Internal training/validation data were labeled using the Bilsky MESCC classification by a musculoskeletal radiologist (10-year experience) and a neuroradiologist (5-year experience). These labels were used to train a DL model utilizing a prototypical convolutional neural network. Internal and external test sets were labeled by the musculoskeletal radiologist as the reference standard. For assessment of DL model performance and interobserver variability, test sets were labeled independently by the neuroradiologist (5-year experience), a spine surgeon (5-year experience), and a radiation oncologist (11-year experience). Inter-rater agreement (Gwet's kappa) and sensitivity/specificity were calculated. Results: Overall, 215 MRI spine studies were analyzed [164 patients, mean age = 62 ± 12(SD)] with 177 (82%) for training/validation and 38 (18%) for internal testing. For internal testing, the DL model and specialists all showed almost perfect agreement (kappas = 0.92-0.98, p < 0.001) for dichotomous Bilsky classification (low versus high grade) compared to the reference standard. Similar performance was seen for external testing on a set of 32 MRI spines with the DL model and specialists all showing almost perfect agreement (kappas = 0.94-0.95, p < 0.001) compared to the reference standard. Conclusion: A DL model showed comparable agreement to a subspecialist radiologist and clinical specialists for the classification of malignant epidural spinal cord compression and could optimize earlier diagnosis and surgical referral.

Indexed as

Bilsky classificationdeep learning modelepidural spinal cord compressionmetastatic epidural spinal cord compressionMRIspinal metastasis classificationspinal metastatic disease

Identifiers

PMID35600347
PMCPMC9114468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.