Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600326›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2022

Topic Modeling for Interpretable Text Classification From EHRs.

Emil Rijcken, Uzay Kaymak, Floortje Scheepers, Pablo Mosteiro, Kalliopi Zervanou, Marco Spruit

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Secure latent Dirichlet allocation.Frontiers in digital health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The added value of text from Dutch general practitioner notes in predictive modeling.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Emil RijckenJheronimus Academy of Data Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Uzay KaymakJheronimus Academy of Data Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Floortje ScheepersUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Pablo MosteiroDepartment of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Kalliopi ZervanouPublic Health and Primary Care (PHEG), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Marco SpruitDepartment of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Eindhoven University of Technology · NLLeiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical notes in electronic health records have many possibilities for predictive tasks in text classification. The interpretability of these classification models for the clinical domain is critical for decision making. Using topic models for text classification of electronic health records for a predictive task allows for the use of topics as features, thus making the text classification more interpretable. However, selecting the most effective topic model is not trivial. In this work, we propose considerations for selecting a suitable topic model based on the predictive performance and interpretability measure for text classification. We compare 17 different topic models in terms of both interpretability and predictive performance in an inpatient violence prediction task using clinical notes. We find no correlation between interpretability and predictive performance. In addition, our results show that although no model outperforms the other models on both variables, our proposed fuzzy topic modeling algorithm (FLSA-W) performs best in most settings for interpretability, whereas two state-of-the-art methods (ProdLDA and LSI) achieve the best predictive performance.

Indexed as

electronic health recordsexplainabilityinformation extractioninterpretabilitynatural language processingpsychiatrytext classificationtopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID35600326
PMCPMC9114871
OpenAlexW4225426732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.