Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600257›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of political research2022

The pandemic and the question of national belonging: Exposure to covid-19 threat and conceptions of nationhood.

Steffen Wamsler, Markus Freitag, Julian Erhardt, Maximilian Filsinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of political research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steffen WamslerInstitute of Political Science University of Bern Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1768-3226
Markus FreitagInstitute of Political Science University of Bern Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2428-0652
Julian ErhardtInstitute of Political Science University of Bern Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4705-8889
Maximilian FilsingerInstitute of Political Science University of Bern Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6583-8301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawing on the behavioural immune system hypothesis, we argue that the prevalence of the Covid-19 pandemic threat in an individual's respective environment relates to exclusive, ethnic conceptions of nationhood. Referring to the affective intelligence theory, we maintain that specific negative emotions are prompted by the perception of being exposed to a pandemic threat, and these emotional states in turn structure political preferences regarding national belonging. Using an original survey in six European countries during the first peak of the pandemic in late April and early May 2020, we analyze both the impact of individual Covid-19 experiences and the contextual exposure to a pandemic threat through hierarchical analyses of 105 European regions. Our empirical analysis shows that exposure to the pandemic is linked to stronger ethnic national identities for both levels of analysis. We also find that anger substantially mediates this relationship and has primacy over feelings of fear. Taken together, our results indicate that the behavioural immune system appears as a pervasive obstacle to inclusive orientations.

Indexed as

affective intelligence theorybehavioural immune system hypothesisconceptions of nationhoodCovid‐19pandemic threat

Identifiers

PMID35600257
PMCPMC9111324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.