Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600228›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2022

Electrocardiogram-Based Machine Learning Emulator Model for Predicting Novel Echocardiography-Derived Phenogroups for Cardiac Risk-Stratification: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Heenaben B Patel, Naveena Yanamala, Brijesh Patel, Sameer Raina, Peter D Farjo, Srinidhi Sunkara, Márton Tokodi, Nobuyuki Kagiyama, Grace Casaclang-Verzosa, Partho P Sengupta

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Computer-aided characterization of the arrhythmogenic substrate after myocardial infarction.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Heenaben B PatelDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV.
Naveena YanamalaDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV.
Brijesh PatelDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV.
Sameer RainaDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV.
Peter D FarjoDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV.
Srinidhi SunkaraDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV.
Márton TokodiDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV.
Nobuyuki KagiyamaDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV.
Grace Casaclang-VerzosaDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV.
Partho P SenguptaDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV.
West Virginia University · USJuntendo University · JPSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Electrocardiography (ECG)-derived machine learning models can predict echocardiography (echo)-derived indices of systolic or diastolic function. However, systolic and diastolic dysfunction frequently coexists, which necessitates an integrated assessment for optimal risk-stratification. We explored an ECG-derived model that emulates an echo-derived model that combines multiple parameters for identifying patient phenogroups at risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods: In this substudy of a prospective, multicenter study, patients from 3 institutions (n=727) formed an internal cohort, and the fourth institution was reserved as an external test set (n=518). A previously validated patient similarity analysis model was used for labeling the patients as low-/high-risk phenogroups. These labels were utilized for training an ECG-derived deep neural network model to predict MACE risk per phenogroup. After 5-fold cross-validation training, the model was tested on the reserved external dataset. Results: Our ECG-derived model showed robust classification of patients, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.87), sensitivity of 80% and 76%, and specificity of 88% and 75% for the internal and external test sets, respectively. The ECG-derived model demonstrated an increased probability for MACE in high-risk vs low-risk patients (21% vs 3%; P<0.001), which was similar to the echo-trained model (21% vs 5%; P<0.001), suggesting comparable utility. Conclusions: This novel ECG-derived machine learning model provides a cost-effective strategy for predicting patient subgroups in whom an integrated milieu of systolic and diastolic dysfunction is associated with a high risk of MACE.

Indexed as

diastolic dysfunctionechocardiographymachine learningsurface electrocardiographytopological data analysis

Identifiers

PMID35600228
PMCPMC9022713
OpenAlexW4224223780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.