ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Treatment outcomes of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis patients with or without human immunodeficiency virus co-infection in Africa and Asia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Body mass index (BMI) at RR-TB diagnosis as an independent predictor of treatment outcomes: a retrospective analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Factors associated with unfavourable treatment outcomes among patients with Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis receiving outpatients care.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Treatment outcomes of multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDRTB) is a challenge, especially in resource limited settings. The aim of this study was to compare whether Human Immune Virus (HIV) has influence on the treatment outcomes of MDRTB among patients in Africa and Asia. Methods: Studies were searched from PubMed, Google scholar, African Journals online, EBSCOhost and CENTRAL from year 2000 until January 2021. The participants in the studies were reported of using MDRTB treatment regimen and also included those with HIV. Studies published before 2000 were excluded. Quality of the review was assessed by AMSTEL 2 criteria. The Mantel- Haenszel random effects method was used for the analysis, with risk ratio (RR) as an effect estimate, with 95% confidence interval and using Stata 14 software. Results: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. Treatment success was low in HIV negative participants (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.58-0.67). However, death was higher in the HIV co-infected participants. (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.25-1.45). There was no significant difference in treatment failure among patients with or without HIV. (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97-1.20). Consistently, no significant difference was found in lost to follow up (LTF) between the two groups (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93-1.20). Conclusion: Treatment success was lower for the MDRTB and HIV co-infections. No significant difference has been found on other outcomes like failure and lost to follow up between patients with HIV co-infected and HIV negative group. The study limitations are that we had only 2 studies representing Asia, and this could have affected the outcome of results. There is need for interventions to improve treatment success in the HIV co-infected group. Other: The protocol was registered in International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO), ID: CRD42021247883. There was no funding for the review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.