Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600089›Full record

ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2022

Continuity Scaling: A Rigorous Framework for Detecting and Quantifying Causality Accurately.

Xiong Ying, Si-Yang Leng, Huan-Fei Ma, Qing Nie, Ying-Cheng Lai, Wei Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Utilizing Causal Network Markers to Identify Tipping Points ahead of Critical Transition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Tipping Point Detection Using Reservoir Computing.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiong YingSchool of Mathematical Sciences, SCMS, and SCAM, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Si-Yang LengResearch Institute for Intelligent Complex Systems, CCSB, and LCNBI, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2285-4758
Huan-Fei MaSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4262-0123
Qing NieDepartment of Mathematics, Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, And NSF-Simons Center for Multiscale Cell Fate Research, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3875, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8804-3368
Ying-Cheng LaiSchool of Electrical, Computer, And Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5706, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0723-733X
Wei LinSchool of Mathematical Sciences, SCMS, and SCAM, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1863-4306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data-based detection and quantification of causation in complex, nonlinear dynamical systems is of paramount importance to science, engineering, and beyond. Inspired by the widely used methodology in recent years, the cross-map-based techniques, we develop a general framework to advance towards a comprehensive understanding of dynamical causal mechanisms, which is consistent with the natural interpretation of causality. In particular, instead of measuring the smoothness of the cross-map as conventionally implemented, we define causation through measuring the

Identifiers

PMID35600089
PMCPMC9101326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.