ArticleGeoHealth2022
Nationwide and Regional PM
Article in GeoHealth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Policy-Relevant Air Quality Metrics Calculated With Sparse In Situ Monitoring and Contiguous Satellite-Derived Data.GeoHealth · 2026Article
- Environmental Quality, Renewable Energy, and Life Expectancy in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Characterizing Air Quality Impacts Related to North Atlantic Offshore Emissions Sources.ACS ES&T air · 2025Article
- Interstate Air Pollution Governance in the United States: Exploring Clean Air Act Section 126.Environmental management · 2024Article
- Air pollution and pregnancy.Seminars in perinatology · 2023Article
- Source-Receptor Relationships Between Precursor Emissions and OEnvironmental science & technology · 2023Article
- Environmental Justice and Carbon Pricing: Can They Be Reconciled?Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2023Article
- Article
- Nationwide and Regional PMGeoHealth · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clean energy policy can provide substantial health benefits through improved air quality. As ambitious clean energy proposals are increasingly considered and adopted across the United States (US), quantifying the benefits of removal of such large air pollution emissions sources is crucial to understanding potential societal impacts of such policy. In this study, we estimate health benefits resulting from the elimination of emissions of fine particulate matter (PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.