ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
Identification, Characterization and Function of Orphan Genes Among the Current Cucurbitaceae Genomes.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Comparative analysis of the Aquaporin gene family in Cucurbitaceae: insights into evolutionary patterns and functional diversity.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Comparative transcriptomics reveal stage-dependent parasitic adaptations in the myxozoan Sphaerospora molnari.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Application of machine learning and genomics for orphan crop improvement.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Candidate orphan genes: Reassessing uniqueness.PloS one · 2025Article
- Orphan geneHorticulture research · 2024Article
- The Lost and Found: Unraveling the Functions of Orphan Genes.Journal of developmental biology · 2023Review
- Article
- Research Advances and Prospects of Orphan Genes in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orphan genes (OGs) that are missing identifiable homologs in other lineages may potentially make contributions to a variety of biological functions. The Cucurbitaceae family consists of a wide range of fruit crops of worldwide or local economic significance. To date, very few functional mechanisms of OGs in Cucurbitaceae are known. In this study, we systematically identified the OGs of eight Cucurbitaceae species using a comparative genomics approach. The content of OGs varied widely among the eight Cucurbitaceae species, ranging from 1.63% in chayote to 16.55% in wax gourd. Genetic structure analysis showed that OGs have significantly shorter protein lengths and fewer exons in Cucurbitaceae. The subcellular localizations of OGs were basically the same, with only subtle differences. Except for aggregation in some chromosomal regions, the distribution density of OGs was higher near the telomeres and relatively evenly distributed on the chromosomes. Gene expression analysis revealed that OGs had less abundantly and highly tissue-specific expression. Interestingly, the largest proportion of these OGs was significantly more tissue-specific expressed in the flower than in other tissues, and more detectable expression was found in the male flower. Functional prediction of OGs showed that (1) 18 OGs associated with male sterility in watermelon; (2) 182 OGs associated with flower development in cucumber; (3) 51 OGs associated with environmental adaptation in watermelon; (4) 520 OGs may help with the large fruit size in wax gourd. Our results provide the molecular basis and research direction for some important mechanisms in Cucurbitaceae species and domesticated crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.