Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35599844›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2022

Beef cows housed in mud during late gestation have greater net energy requirements compared with cows housed on wood chip bedding.

Kirsten R Nickles, Alejandro E Relling, Alvaro Garcia-Guerra, Francis L Fluharty, Justin Kieffer, Anthony J Parker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kirsten R NicklesDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA.
Alejandro E RellingDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1288-3037
Alvaro Garcia-GuerraDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4114-5965
Francis L FluhartyDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Justin KiefferDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Anthony J ParkerDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6370-6623
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mud increases net energy requirements for cattle because mud and precipitation compromise the ability of the hair coat to insulate and maintain core body temperature of the cow. The increase in energy required for a gestating cow to compensate for a muddy environment is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate effects of muddy conditions on cow body weight (BW) and fetal growth during late gestation. Sixteen multiparous Angus cows (

Indexed as

fetal growthlate gestationmudnet energy requirements

Identifiers

PMID35599844
PMCPMC9115909
OpenAlexW4224039605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.