ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Top 100 Most-Cited Articles on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualized Study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgery from 1997 to 2022: a bibliometric and visual analysis.Updates in surgery · 2024Review
- Top 100 cited articles in the thromboangiitis obliterans: a bibliometric analysis and visualized study.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Bibliometric and visual analysis of intraoperative hypotension from 2004 to 2022.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Grand challenges in visceral surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is widely implemented in surgeries, and this study aims to reveal the characteristics of the 100 most-cited original articles in the field of ERAS research. Methods: The literature was retrieved in the Web of Science database, the 100 most-cited original articles were identified, and their characteristics were analyzed, including the trends of publications and citations; contributions from countries, institutions, and authors; co-cited authors and journals in the references; served surgeries, research endpoints, keywords; and the level of evidence. Results: There was a rising trend in the yearly publications and citations. Denmark and the USA contributed the largest number of highly cited papers. The University of Copenhagen was the most influential institution. Kehlet, Henrik was the most influential author. The Conclusions: The highly cited research overwhelming implemented ERAS in colorectal surgeries, the "length of stay" was the most focused element, and Kehlet, Henrik was the most influential researcher. Most of the highly cited ERAS had low levels of evidence, and the total number of citations was not relevant to the level of evidence. Therefore, studies with high levels of evidence are still required in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.