ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Non-circular CBCT orbit design and realization on a clinical robotic C-arm for metal artifact reduction.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Digital Image Optimisation in Intraoperative 2D and 3D Imaging Using a Mobile C-Arm With Flat-Panel Detector.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025Article
- Universal non-circular cone beam CT orbits for metal artifact reduction imaging during image-guided procedures.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cone-beam CT with a noncircular (sine-on-sphere) orbit: imaging performance of a clinical system for image-guided interventions.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Fully automatic online geometric calibration for non-circular cone-beam CT orbits using fiducials with unknown placement.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Practical workflow for arbitrary non-circular orbits for CT with clinical robotic C-arms.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metal artifacts have been a difficult challenge for cone-beam CT (CBCT), especially for intraoperative imaging. Metal surgical tools and implants are often present in the field of view and can attenuate X-rays so heavily that they essentially create a missing-data problem. Recently, an increasing number of intra-operative imaging systems such as robotic C-arms are capable of non-circular orbits for data acquisition. Such trajectories can potentially improve sampling and the degree of data completeness to solve the metal-induced missing-data problem, thereby reducing or eliminating the associated image artifacts. In this work, we extend our prior theoretical and experimental work and implement non-circular orbits for metal artifact reduction on a clinical robotic C-arm (Siemens Artis zeego). To maximize the potential for clinical translation, we restrict our implementation to standard built-in motion and data collection functions, also available on other zeego systems, and work within the physical constraints and limitations on positioning and motion. Customized software tools for data extraction, processing, calibration, and reconstruction are used. We demonstrate example non-circular orbits and the resulting image quality using a phantom containing pedicle screws for spine fixation. As compared with a standard circular CBCT orbit, these non-circular orbits exhibit significantly reduced metal artifacts. These results suggest a high potential for image quality improvements for intraoperative CBCT imaging when metal tools or implants are present in the field-of-view.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.