Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35599364›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2022

Machine learning algorithms to estimate everolimus exposure trained on simulated and patient pharmacokinetic profiles.

Marc Labriffe, Jean-Baptiste Woillard, Jean Debord, Pierre Marquet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rising Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Pharmacometrics and Model-Informed Precision Dosing in Pediatrics.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Artificial intelligence in pharmacology research and practice.Clinical and translational science · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marc LabriffePharmacology & Transplantation, INSERM U1248, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5840-8904
Jean-Baptiste WoillardPharmacology & Transplantation, INSERM U1248, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1695-0695
Jean DebordPharmacology & Transplantation, INSERM U1248, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3309-1100
Pierre MarquetPharmacology & Transplantation, INSERM U1248, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7698-0760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everolimus is an immunosuppressant with a small therapeutic index and large between-patient variability. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) is the best marker of exposure but measuring it requires collecting many blood samples. The objective of this study was to train machine learning (ML) algorithms using pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles from kidney transplant recipients, simulated profiles, or both types, and compare their performance for everolimus AUC

Indexed as

EverolimusKidney TransplantationAlgorithmsArea Under CurveBayes TheoremHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMachine LearningEverolimusImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID35599364
PMCPMC9381914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.