Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35599354›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2022

Influence of middle hepatic vein resection during right or left hepatectomy on post hepatectomy outcomes.

Anisa Nutu, Michael Wilson, Erin Ross, Kunal Joshi, Robert Sutcliffe, Keith Roberts, Ravi Marudanayagam, Paolo Muiesan, Nikolaos Chatzizacharias, Darius Mirza and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anisa NutuDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4699-0970
Michael WilsonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1395-3081
Erin RossDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9039-9622
Kunal JoshiDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2360-8911
Robert SutcliffeDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1881-7655
Keith RobertsDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1799-9829
Ravi MarudanayagamDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0640-3535
Paolo MuiesanDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7389-6691
Nikolaos ChatzizachariasDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4864-189X
Darius MirzaDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7531-9089
John IsaacDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5520-0734
Bobby V M DasariDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2375-1141
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Middle hepatic vein (MHV) is usually preserved as a part of the right or left hepatectomy in order preserve the venous outflow of remnant liver. The aim of this study was to evaluate if resection of MHV could influence post-resection outcomes of standard right or left hepatectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent standard right or left hepatectomy between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. Anatomical remnant liver volumes were measured retrospectively using the Hermes workstation (Hermes Medical Solutions AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Uni- and multi-variate analyses were performed to assess the difference in outcomes of those with preservation of MHV and those without preservation. Results: A total of 144 patients were included. Right hepatectomy was performed for 114 (79.2%) and left hepatectomy was performed for 30 (20.8%) patients. MHV was resected for 13 (9.0%) in addition to the standard right or left hepatectomy. Median remnant liver volume was significantly higher in the MHV resected group ( Conclusions: Resection of the MHV at standard right or left hepatectomy did not have a negative impact on postoperative outcomes of patients with adequate remnant liver volume.

Indexed as

Hepatic veinLiverSurgery

Identifiers

PMID35599354
PMCPMC9428431
OpenAlexW4281286635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.