Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35598856›Full record

SynthesisClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2022

Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Todd C Lee, Srinivas Murthy, Olivier Del Corpo, Julien Senécal, Guillaume Butler-Laporte, Zahra N Sohani, James M Brophy, Emily G McDonald

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Favipiravir for treating COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Effect of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and baricitinib on mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 treated with corticosteroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Todd C LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Occupational Health, and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montréal, Canada. Electronic address: todd.lee@mcgill.ca.
Srinivas MurthyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Olivier Del CorpoFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Julien SenécalFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Guillaume Butler-LaporteDepartment of Epidemiology, Occupational Health, and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Zahra N SohaniDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
James M BrophyDepartment of Epidemiology, Occupational Health, and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Emily G McDonaldClinical Practice Assessment Unit, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre · CAMcGill University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefits of remdesivir in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remain debated with the National Institutes of Health and the World Health Organization providing contradictory recommendations for and against use.

objectivesTo evaluate the role of remdesivir for hospitalized inpatients as a function of oxygen requirements. DATA SOURCES: Beginning with our prior systematic review, we searched MEDLINE using PubMed from 15 January 2021 through 5 May 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials; all languages.

participantsAll hospitalized adults with COVID-19.

interventionsRemdesivir, in comparison to either placebo, or standard of care. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: We used the ROB-2 criteria. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: The primary outcome was mortality, stratified by oxygen use (none, supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation, and mechanical ventilation). We conducted a frequentist random effects meta-analysis on the risk ratio scale and, to contextualize the probabilistic benefits, we also performed a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis on the risk difference scale. A ≥1% absolute risk reduction was considered clinically important.

resultsWe identified eight randomized trials, totaling 10 751 participants. The risk ratio for mortality comparing remdesivir vs. control was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.5-1.19) in the patients who did not require supplemental oxygen; 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79-0.99) for nonventilated patients requiring oxygen; and 1.08 (95% CI, 0.88-1.31) in the setting of mechanical ventilation. Using neutral priors, the probabilities that remdesivir reduces mortality were 76.8%, 93.8%, and 14.7%, respectively. The probability that remdesivir reduced mortality by ≥ 1% was 77.4% for nonventilated patients requiring oxygen.

conclusionsBased on this meta-analysis, there is a high probability that remdesivir reduces mortality for nonventilated patients with COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen therapy. Treatment guidelines should be re-evaluated.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdenosine MonophosphateAdultAlanineBayes TheoremHumansOxygenSARS-CoV-2United StatesAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineOxygenremdesivirCoronavirusCOVID-19Meta-analysisMortalityRemdesivir

Identifiers

PMID35598856
PMCPMC9117160
OpenAlexW4280644200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.