ArticleF&S science2022
Pesticide residue intake from fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis.
Article in F&S science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations of Pesticide Residue Exposure from Fruit and Vegetable Intake with Ovarian Reserve.The Journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Diet in Prevention and Treatment of Endometriosis: Current State of Knowledge.Current nutrition reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the association between the intake of fruits and vegetables with high- vs. low-pesticide residue burden and diagnosis of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis. The etiology of endometriosis is not well understood, but dietary factors may influence the risk. Pesticides may act as endocrine disruptors, and the intake of pesticide-contaminated food is a common exposure pathway.
designProspective cohort study. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the intake of fruits and vegetables with high- and low-pesticide residues in relation to the diagnosis of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis.
settingNot applicable. PATIENT(S): Premenopausal US women (N = 52,053) of the Nurses' Health Study II, aged 34-53 years at study baseline (1999), were followed until 2013. The diet was assessed every 4 years using a validated food frequency questionnaire. A previously developed and validated pesticide residue burden score (PRBS), on the basis of the US Department of Agriculture Pesticide Data Program, was used to assign fruits and vegetables to pesticide residue groups (high/low). INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cases of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis were identified from self-reports to validated questionnaires. RESULT(S): During 14 years of follow-up, 956 incidences of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis were reported. No association was observed between the intake of high- or low-PRBS fruit and vegetable intake and endometriosis (hazard ratio for 5th vs. 1st quintile: high-PRBS intake = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.73-1.23; low-PRBS intake = 1.07, 95% confidence interval = 0.82-1.40). No associations were observed for high- or low-PRBS fruit and vegetable intake by fertility status. CONCLUSION(S): No clear associations were observed between high- or low-PRBS fruit and vegetable intake and endometriosis risk among premenopausal women. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the association between dietary pesticide residue intake and endometriosis. Further research is needed, particularly to evaluate this association among a younger population of women (adolescence or early adulthood) and assess the dietary exposure to specific pesticides or chemical families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.