ArticleAppetite2022
Combining passive eating monitoring and ecological momentary assessment to characterize dietary lapses from a lifestyle modification intervention.
Article in Appetite, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03739151 (Applying Novel Passive Sensing Technology to Target Adherence to Diet in Behavioral Obesity Treatment for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease Risk), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Applying Novel Passive Sensing Technology to Target Adherence to Diet in Behavioral Obesity Treatment for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease Risk
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to Understand Overweight and Obesity: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- An explanation for the accuracy of sensor-based measures of energy intake: Amount of food consumed matters more than dietary composition.Appetite · 2024 · on this mapArticle
- Sexual minority stressors and disordered eating behaviors in daily life: a daily diary study of sexual minority cisgender female couples.Eating disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dietary lapses (i.e., specific instances of nonadherence to recommended dietary goals) contribute to suboptimal weight loss outcomes during lifestyle modification programs. Passive eating monitoring could enhance lapse measurement via objective assessment of eating characteristics that could be markers for lapse (e.g., more bites consumed). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if passively-inferred eating characteristics (i.e., bites, eating duration, and eating rate), measured via wrist-worn device, could distinguish dietary lapses from non-lapse eating. Adults (n = 25) with overweight/obesity received a 24-week lifestyle modification intervention. Participants completed ecological momentary assessment (EMA; repeated smartphone surveys) biweekly to self-report on dietary lapses and non-lapse eating episodes. Participants wore a wrist device that captured continuous wrist motion. Previously-validated algorithms inferred eating episodes from wrist data, and calculated bite count, duration, and rate (seconds per bite). Mixed effects logistic regressions revealed no simple effects of bite count, duration, or eating rate on the likelihood of dietary lapse. Moderation analyses revealed that eating episodes in the evening were more likely to be lapses if they involved fewer bites (B = -0.16, p < .05), were shorter (B = -0.54, p < .05), or had a slower rate (B = 1.27, p < .001). Statistically significant interactions between eating characteristics (Bs = -0.30 to -0.08, ps < .001) revealed two distinct patterns. Eating episodes that were 1. smaller, slower, and shorter than average, or 2. larger, quicker, and longer than average were associated with increased probability of lapse. This study is the first to use objective eating monitoring to characterize dietary lapses throughout a lifestyle modification intervention. Results demonstrate the potential of sensors to identify non-adherence using only patterns of passively-sensed eating characteristics, thereby minimizing the need for self-report in future studies. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT03739151.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.