Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35598382›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2022

Construction and validation of a novel apoptosis-associated prognostic signature related to osteosarcoma metastasis and immune infiltration.

Yucheng Fu, Zhijian Jin, Yuhui Shen, Zhusheng Zhang, Meng Li, Zhuochao Liu, Guoyu He, Jintao Wu, Junxiang Wen, Qiyuan Bao and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yucheng FuDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Zhijian JinDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Yuhui ShenDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Zhusheng ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Meng LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Zhuochao LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Guoyu HeDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Jintao WuDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Junxiang WenDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Qiyuan BaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Jun WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Weibin ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, PR China. Electronic address: zhangweibin10368@163.com.
Ruijin Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApoptosis played vital roles in the formation and progression of osteosarcoma. However, no studies elucidated the prognostic relationships between apoptosis-associated genes (AAGs) and osteosarcoma.

methodsThe differentially expressed genes associated with osteosarcoma metastasis and apoptosis were identified from GEO and MSigDB databases. The apoptosis-associated prognostic signature was established through univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curve, ROC curve and nomogram were constructed to investigate the predictive value of this signature. CIBERSORT algorithm and ssGSEA were used to explore the relationships between immune infiltration and AAG signature. The above results were validated in another GEO dataset and the expression of AAGs was also validated in osteosarcoma patient samples by immunohistochemistry.

resultsHSPB1 and IER3 were involved in AAG signature. In training and validation datasets, apoptosis-associated risk scores were negatively related to patient survival rates and the AAG signature was regarded as the independent prognostic factor. ROC and calibration curves demonstrated the signature and nomogram were reliable. GSEA revealed the signature related to immune-associated pathways. ssGSEA indicated that one immune cell and three immune functions were significantly dysregulated. The immunohistochemistry analyses of patients' samples revealed that AAGs were significantly differently expressed between metastasis and non-metastasis osteosarcomas.

conclusionsThe present study identified and validated a novel apoptosis-associated prognostic signature related to osteosarcoma metastasis. It could serve as the potential biomarker and therapeutic targets for osteosarcoma in the future.

Indexed as

ApoptosisImmuneMetastasisOsteosarcomaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35598382
PMCPMC9126984
OpenAlexW4280500127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.