SynthesisBJS open2022
The dilemma of the disappeared colorectal liver metastasis: systematic review of reviews and evidence gap map.
Synthesis in BJS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disappearing Colorectal Liver Metastases: Should the Treatment Sequence Be Reconsidered for Selected Lesions?Cancers · 2026Article
- Upfront Thermal Ablation versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Ablation for Oligometastatic Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Chemo First or Ablation First? The Sequencing Dilemma in Ablatable Colorectal Liver Metastases.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Effect of disappearing liver metastases during pre-ablation chemotherapy on the prognosis of percutaneous microwave ablation in synchronous colorectal liver metastases patients.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Wingless/It/β-catenin signaling in liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: A focus on biological mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.