ArticleMedical physics2022
Nested block self-attention multiple resolution residual network for multiorgan segmentation from CT.
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Towards more precise automatic analysis: a systematic review of deep learning-based multi-organ segmentation.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Pooled it
- Daily quality assurance, system and procedure-specific commissioning of a bore-based optical surface imaging system for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT).Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Beyond auto-segmentation: the case for planning and dosimetry AI in head and neck radiation oncology.BMJ oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical experience with a same-day simulation and treatment program for stereotactic radiation therapy on a C-arm linac.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence based classification and prediction of medical imaging using a novel framework of inverted and self-attention deep neural network architecture.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-scale nested UNet with transformer for colorectal polyp segmentation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Application of visual transformer in renal image analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Review
- Self-Adaptive Teacher-Student framework for colon polyp segmentation from unannotated private data with public annotated datasets.PloS one · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based dominant index lesion segmentation for MR-guided radiation therapy of prostate cancer.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Automated Classification of Lung Cancer Subtypes Using Deep Learning and CT-Scan Based Radiomic Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- UMRFormer-net: a three-dimensional U-shaped pancreas segmentation method based on a double-layer bridged transformer network.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFast and accurate multiorgans segmentation from computed tomography (CT) scans is essential for radiation treatment planning. Self-attention(SA)-based deep learning methodologies provide higher accuracies than standard methods but require memory and computationally intensive calculations, which restricts their use to relatively shallow networks. PURPOSE: Our goal was to develop and test a new computationally fast and memory-efficient bidirectional SA method called nested block self-attention (NBSA), which is applicable to shallow and deep multiorgan segmentation networks.
methodsA new multiorgan segmentation method combining a deep multiple resolution residual network with computationally efficient SA called nested block SA (MRRN-NBSA) was developed and evaluated to segment 18 different organs from head and neck (HN) and abdomen organs. MRRN-NBSA combines features from multiple image resolutions and feature levels with SA to extract organ-specific contextual features. Computational efficiency is achieved by using memory blocks of fixed spatial extent for SA calculation combined with bidirectional attention flow. Separate models were trained for HN (n = 238) and abdomen (n = 30) and tested on set aside open-source grand challenge data sets for HN (n = 10) using a public domain database of computational anatomy and blinded testing on 20 cases from Beyond the Cranial Vault data set with overall accuracy provided by the grand challenge website for abdominal organs. Robustness to two-rater segmentations was also evaluated for HN cases using the open-source data set. Statistical comparison of MRRN-NBSA against Unet, convolutional network-based SA using criss-cross attention (CCA), dual SA, and transformer-based (UNETR) methods was done by measuring the differences in the average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) accuracy for all HN organs using the Kruskall-Wallis test, followed by individual method comparisons using paired, two-sided Wilcoxon-signed rank tests at 95% confidence level with Bonferroni correction used for multiple comparisons.
resultsMRRN-NBSA produced an average high DSC of 0.88 for HN and 0.86 for the abdomen that exceeded current methods. MRRN-NBSA was more accurate than the computationally most efficient CCA (average DSC of 0.845 for HN, 0.727 for abdomen). Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant difference between evaluated methods (p=0.00025). Pair-wise comparisons showed significant differences between MRRN-NBSA than Unet (p=0.0003), CCA (p=0.030), dual (p=0.038), and UNETR methods (p=0.012) after Bonferroni correction. MRRN-NBSA produced less variable segmentations for submandibular glands (0.82 ± 0.06) compared to two raters (0.75 ± 0.31).
conclusionsMRRN-NBSA produced more accurate multiorgan segmentations than current methods on two different public data sets. Testing on larger institutional cohorts is required to establish feasibility for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.