Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35598031›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2022

Hospital-wide cardiac arrest in situ simulation to identify and mitigate latent safety threats.

Suzanne K Bentley, Alexander Meshel, Lorraine Boehm, Barbara Dilos, Mamie McIndoe, Rachel Carroll-Bennett, Alfredo J Astua, Lillian Wong, Colleen Smith, Laura Iavicoli and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Roles of anesthesia assistants within the code blue team at in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests: A retrospective analysis.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Going in Blind: A Common Scenario in an Uncommon Situation.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne K BentleySimulation Center at Elmhurst, NYC Health + Hospital/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA. BentleyS@nychhc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0192-3133
Alexander MeshelDepartment of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Lorraine BoehmSimulation Center at Elmhurst, NYC Health + Hospital/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA.
Barbara DilosDepartment of Anesthesiology, NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA.
Mamie McIndoePatient Experience, NYC Health + Hospital/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA.
Rachel Carroll-BennettDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYC Health + Hospital/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA.
Alfredo J AstuaPulmonary and Critical Care, NYC Health + Hospital/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA.
Lillian WongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Colleen SmithDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Laura IavicoliDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Julia LaMonicaEmergency Medicine, NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA.
Tania LopezPediatrics, NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA.
Jose QuitainPediatrics, NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA.
Guirlene DubeNYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA.
Alex F ManiniEmergency Medicine, NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA.
Joseph HalbachNYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY, USA.
Michael MeguerdichianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, NYC Health + Hospitals/Harlem, New York, NY, USA.
Komal BajajNYC Health + Hospital/Jacobi, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0942-3021
Elmhurst Hospital Center · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNew York City Health and Hospitals Corporation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac arrest resuscitation requires well-executed teamwork to produce optimal outcomes. Frequency of cardiac arrest events differs by hospital location, which presents unique challenges in care due to variations in responding team composition and comfort levels and familiarity with obtaining and utilizing arrest equipment. The objective of this initiative is to utilize unannounced, in situ, cardiac arrest simulations hospital wide to educate, evaluate, and maximize cardiac arrest teams outside the traditional simulation lab by systematically assessing and capturing areas of opportunity for improvement, latent safety threats (LSTs), and key challenges by hospital location.

methodsUnannounced in situ simulations were performed at a city hospital with multidisciplinary cardiac arrest teams responding to a presumed real cardiac arrest. Participants and facilitators identified LSTs during standardized postsimulation debriefings that were classified into equipment, medication, resource/system, or technical skill categories. A hazard matrix was used by multiplying occurrence frequency of LST in simulation and real clinical events (based on expert opinion) and severity of the LST based on agreement between two evaluators.

resultsSeventy-four in situ cardiac arrest simulations were conducted hospital wide. Hundreds of safety threats were identified, analyzed, and categorized yielding 106 unique latent safety threats: 21 in the equipment category, 8 in the medication category, 41 in the resource/system category, and 36 in the technical skill category. The team worked to mitigate all LSTs with priority mitigation to imminent risk level threats, then high risk threats, followed by non-imminent risk LSTs. Four LSTs were deemed imminent, requiring immediate remediation post debriefing. Fifteen LSTs had a hazard ratio greater than 8 which were deemed high risk for remediation. Depending on the category of threat, a combination of mitigating steps including the immediate fixing of an identified problem, leadership escalation, and programmatic intervention recommendations occurred resulting in mitigation of all identified threats.

conclusionsHospital-wide in situ cardiac arrest team simulation offers an effective way to both identify and mitigate LSTs. Safety during cardiac arrest care is improved through the use of a system in which LSTs are escalated urgently, mitigated, and conveyed back to participants to provide closed loop debriefing. Lastly, this hospital-wide, multidisciplinary initiative additionally served as an educational needs assessment allowing for informed, iterative education and systems improvement initiatives targeted to areas of LSTs and areas of opportunity.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestLatent safety threatPatient safetyQualitySimulation

Identifiers

PMID35598031
PMCPMC9124397
OpenAlexW4281259936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.