Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35597986›Full record

Observational studyBMC public health2022

Changing the home visiting research paradigm: models' perspectives on behavioral pathways and intervention techniques to promote good birth outcomes.

Anne K Duggan, Kelly M Bower, Ciara Z Spinosa, Kay O'Neill, Deborah Daro, Kathryn Harding, Allison Ingalls, Allison Kemner, Crista Marchesseault, William Thorland

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. The Role of Open Science Practices in Scaling Evidence-Based Prevention Programs.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anne K DugganJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. aduggan@jhu.edu.
Kelly M BowerJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Ciara Z SpinosaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Kay O'NeillJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Deborah DaroChapin Hall at the University of Chicago, 1313 E. 60th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Kathryn HardingHealthy Families America at Prevent Child Abuse America, 228 S. Wabash, 10th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60604, USA.
Allison IngallsDepartment of International Health, Center for American Indian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 415 N. Washington Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Allison KemnerParents As Teachers National Center, 2228 Ball Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63146, USA.
Crista MarchesseaultMinding the Baby National Office: Yale Child Study Center & Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, P.O. Box 208056, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
William ThorlandNurse-Family Partnership, National Service Office, 1900 Grant Street, Suite 400, Denver, CO, 80203, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US is scaling up evidence-based home visiting to promote health equity in expectant families and families with young children. Persistently small average effects for full models argue for a new research paradigm to understand what interventions within models work best, for which families, in which contexts, why, and how. Historically, the complexity and proprietary nature of most evidence-based models have been barriers to such research. To address this, stakeholders are building the Precision Paradigm, a common framework and language to define and test interventions and their mediators and moderators. This observational study used portions of an early version of the Precision Paradigm to describe models' intended behavioral pathways to good birth outcomes and their stance on home visitors' use of specific intervention technique categories to promote families' progress along intended pathways.

methodsFive evidence-based home visiting models participated. Model representatives independently completed three structured surveys focused on 41 potential behavioral pathways to good birth outcomes, and 23 behavior change technique categories. Survey data were used to describe and compare models' intended behavioral pathways, explicit endorsement of behavior change technique categories, expectations for home visitors' relative emphasis in using endorsed technique categories, and consistency in endorsing technique categories across intended pathways.

resultsModels differed substantially in nearly all respects: their intended pathways to good birth outcomes (range 16-41); the number of technique categories they endorsed in any intended pathway (range 12-23); the mean number of technique categories they endorsed per intended pathway (range 1.5-20.0); and their consistency in endorsing technique categories across intended pathways (22%-100% consistency). Models were similar in rating nearly all behavior change technique categories as at least compatible with their model, even if not explicitly endorsed.

conclusionsModels successfully used components of the Precision Paradigm to define and differentiate their intended behavioral pathways and their expectations for home visitors' use of specific technique categories to promote family progress on intended pathways. Use of the Precision Paradigm can accelerate innovative cross-model research to describe current models and to learn which interventions within home visiting work best for which families, in which contexts, why and how.

Indexed as

Health PromotionHouse CallsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansPostnatal CarePregnancyBirth outcomesHome visitingIntervention techniquesPrecision services

Identifiers

PMID35597986
PMCPMC9123293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.