Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35597908›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022

Inference following multiple imputation for generalized additive models: an investigation of the median p-value rule with applications to the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry and Colorado COVID-19 hospitalization data.

Matthew A Bolt, Samantha MaWhinney, Jack W Pattee, Kristine M Erlandson, David B Badesch, Ryan A Peterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating the medianJournal of applied statistics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex differences in the role of sleep on cognition in older adults.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew A BoltDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado-Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E. 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, USA.
Samantha MaWhinneyDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado-Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E. 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jack W PatteeDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado-Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E. 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kristine M ErlandsonSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado-Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0808-6729
David B BadeschSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado-Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ryan A PetersonDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado-Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E. 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, USA. ryan.a.peterson@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4650-5798

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
Predictors of Recovery and the App-Facilitated Tele-Rehabilitation (AFTER) Program for COVID SurvivorsR01AG054366 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ERLANDSON, KRISTINE MACE, STEVENS-LAPSLEY, JENNIFER E. · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMissing data prove troublesome in data analysis; at best they reduce a study's statistical power and at worst they induce bias in parameter estimates. Multiple imputation via chained equations is a popular technique for dealing with missing data. However, techniques for combining and pooling results from fitted generalized additive models (GAMs) after multiple imputation have not been well explored.

methodsWe simulated missing data under MCAR, MAR, and MNAR frameworks and utilized random forest and predictive mean matching imputation to investigate a variety of rules for combining GAMs after multiple imputation with binary and normally distributed outcomes. We compared multiple pooling procedures including the "D2" method, the Cauchy combination test, and the median p-value (MPV) rule. The MPV rule involves simply computing and reporting the median p-value across all imputations. Other ad hoc methods such as a mean p-value rule and a single imputation method are investigated. The viability of these methods in pooling results from B-splines is also examined for normal outcomes. An application of these various pooling techniques is then performed on two case studies, one which examines the effect of elevation on a six-minute walk distance (a normal outcome) for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, and the other which examines risk factors for intubation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients (a dichotomous outcome).

resultsIn comparison to the results from generalized additive models fit on full datasets, the median p-value rule performs as well as if not better than the other methods examined. In situations where the alternative hypothesis is true, the Cauchy combination test appears overpowered and alternative methods appear underpowered, while the median p-value rule yields results similar to those from analyses of complete data.

conclusionsFor pooling results after fitting GAMs to multiply imputed datasets, the median p-value is a simple yet useful approach which balances both power to detect important associations and control of Type I errors.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hypertension, PulmonaryColoradoHospitalizationHumansModels, StatisticalRegistriesCauchy combination testCOVID-19ElevationMissing dataPooling resultsPulmonary arterial hypertensionSimulation studySplines

Identifiers

PMID35597908
PMCPMC9123297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.