ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Correlation between EFAS- and MOCART score and clinical outcome after AMIC
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective comparison of two different surgical technique in the treatment of deep osteochondral lesions of the talus: mosaicplasty versus all-arthroscopic technique with scaffold and autograft bone taken from the tibial plafond.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Trial
- Arthroscopic techniques in ankle surgery.Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2025Review
- Mid-term results of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis surgery with or without scaffolds for arthroscopic treatment of deep talus osteochondral lesions: A comparative study.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEven though an increased interest in the use of the EFAS Score (European Foot and Ankle Society) has been observed, no data comparing it with radiological findings has been presented in the literature. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to investigate how the post-operative integration of the AMIC MATERIAL AND
methodsA group of 24 patients aged between 17 and 63 (with a mean age of 35.7) were included at least 1 year post-operatively. They had all undergone an AMIC
resultsOur main results showed no correlation between the MOCART-Score and the EFAS-Score (R = - 0.08). There was also no correlation between the MOCART-Score, the FFI-Score (Foot and Function Index) (R = 0.2) and the MOXFQ-Score (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire) (R = 0.12). There was no correlation between components of the MOCART-Score with the EFAS-Score (R between - 0.32 and 0.23).
conclusionOur results question whether the MRI (a standard part of AMIC
Indexed as
Identifiers
35597883What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.