Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35597836›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2022

Feasibility of endoscopic endonasal resection of intrinsic third ventricular craniopharyngioma in adults.

Lei Cao, Wentao Wu, Jie Kang, Kefan Cai, Chuzhong Li, Chunhui Liu, Haibo Zhu, Suming Gen, Yazhuo Zhang, Songbai Gui

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei CaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Forth West Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Wentao WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Forth West Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Jie KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Forth West Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Kefan CaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Forth West Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Chuzhong LiBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Forth West Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Chunhui LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Forth West Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Haibo ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Forth West Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Suming GenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Forth West Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Yazhuo ZhangBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Forth West Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Songbai GuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Forth West Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China. guisongbai@yeah.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-2018
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support XMLX202108Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission Z19110700660000Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2020-4-1077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsic third ventricular craniopharyngiomas (IVCs) are usually considered as a contraindication of endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of EEA for the resection of IVCs based on MRI topographical diagnosis and surgical findings. We reviewed the data of 22 patients who were diagnosed to be IVCs according to five MRI criteria and underwent surgery through EEA. Sixteen IVCs were resected using endoscopic endonasal infrachiasmatic corridor, five IVCs by using endoscopic endonasal suprachiasmatic trans-lamina terminalis corridor, and one IVC by using both the infrachiasmatic and suprachiasmatic corridors. During the operation, all the 22 cases were verified to be IVCs. Gross total resection was achieved in 21 (95.5%) patients. After surgery, visual improvement was observed in 14 (63.6%) patients, no change in 6 (27.3%) patients, and some deterioration in 2 (9.1%) patients. An improvement in intellectual ability was observed in nine (40.9%) patients, no change in twelve (54.5%) patients, and some deterioration in one (4.5%) patient. Fifteen of the 22 patients (68.2%) developed new endocrinological deficit. One postoperative cerebral spinal fluid leakage occurred. EEA can be used as a safe and efficacious approach for the radical resection of IVCs. The combination of the five MRI criteria may serve as an accurate preoperative diagnostic tool to define the topographical relationships between craniopharyngiomas and the third ventricle. The endoscopic transnasal view from below has the advantage of clarifying the relationship between tumors and the third ventricle floor.

Indexed as

CraniopharyngiomaNeuroendoscopyPituitary NeoplasmsThird VentricleAdultEndoscopyFeasibility StudiesHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCraniopharyngiomaEndoscopic endonasal approachIntraventricularSurgeryThird ventricle

Identifiers

PMID35597836
OpenAlexW4281263794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.