ArticleScientific reports2022
Selective interaction and its effect on collective motion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Body orientation change of neighbors leads to scale-free correlation in collective motion.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plenty of empirical evidence on biological swarms reveal that interaction between individuals is selective. Each individual's neighbor is selected based on one or more featured factors. Based on the self-propelled model, we develop a general probability neighbor selection framework to study the effect of four typical featured factors (i.e., distance, bearing, orientation change and bearing change). In this work, two common cases are involved to comprehensively analyze the impact of the four featured factors on the collective motion. One is the flocking, the other is the responsivity to stimulus. The impact of different selection strengths of the featured factors on both cases are investigated. The effect of noise on flocking and different stimulus intensities on responsivity to stimulus are analyzed. This study allows us to get the insight of selective interaction and suggests the potential solution to overcome the trade-off between flocking and responsivity quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.