Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35597685›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2022

Sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: Opportunity for medical waste reform.

Leah A Marsh, Emeline M Aviki, Jason D Wright, Ling Chen, Nadeem Abu-Rustum, Ritu Salani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leah A MarshDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: lmarsh@mednet.ucla.edu.
Emeline M AvikiGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, United States of America.
Jason D WrightDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Ling ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Nadeem Abu-RustumGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, United States of America.
Ritu SalaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs healthcare expenditures continue to rise, identifying mechanisms to reduce unnecessary costs is critical. The objective of this study is to estimate the annual cost of wasted indocyanine green (ICG) used for sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial cancer.

methodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database and Premier database, we determined the annual number of cases in which sentinel lymph node mapping with ICG would be used and the median cost of ICG to institutions and patients, respectively. We assumed that gynecologic oncologists use 2-4 mL (20-40%) of the currently available ICG vial kit (25 mg per 10 mL) per case. Estimated waste was then calculated using cost as a measure of institutional waste and charge as excess cost transferred to patients or payers.

resultsAn estimated 45,864 cases of localized endometrial cancer were identified and eligible for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping. The mean total cost associated with ICG was 99.20 and the mean charge was $483.64. The estimated excess annual cost to hospitals was $2,729,825 to $3,639,767. Similarly, using mean charge data, the annual cost of wasted drug for patients and payers was $13,308,999 to $17,745,332.

conclusionsThe annual cost of wasted ICG due to its current manufactured vial size exceeds $2 million for hospitals and $13.3-$17.7 million for patients. We suggest ICG vials should be packaged in a 10 mg vial kit (2-4 mL sterile solution) to avoid drug waste and the financial impact to institutions and patients.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsMedical WasteSentinel Lymph NodeFemaleHumansIndocyanine GreenSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyIndocyanine GreenMedical WasteEndometrial cancerIndocyanine green (ICG)Medical wasteSentinel lymph node dissection

Identifiers

PMID35597685
PMCPMC9772901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.