ArticleJournal of molecular biology2022
Electrostatics Drive the Molecular Chaperone BiP to Preferentially Bind Oligomerized States of a Client Protein.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanism of client loading from BiP to Grp94 and its disruption by select inhibitors.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation-Biologics Approach for Structure-Based Protein Charge Prediction.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- The endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP is a closure-accelerating cochaperone of Grp94.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hsp70 chaperones bind short monomeric peptides with a weak characteristic affinity in the low micromolar range, but can also bind some aggregates, fibrils, and amyloids, with low nanomolar affinity. While this differential affinity enables Hsp70 to preferentially target potentially toxic aggregates, it is unknown how a chaperone can differentiate between monomeric and aggregated states of a client protein and why preferential binding is only observed for some aggregated clients but not others. Here we examine the interaction of BiP (the Hsp70 paralog in the endoplasmic reticulum) with the client proIGF2, the pro-protein form of IGF2 that includes a long and mostly disordered E-peptide region that promotes proIGF2 oligomerization. By dissecting the mechanism by which BiP targets proIGF2 and E-peptide oligomers we discover that electrostatic attraction is a powerful driving force for oligomer recognition. We identify the specific BiP binding sites on proIGF2 and as monomers they bind BiP with characteristically weak affinity in the low micromolar range, but electrostatic attraction to E-peptide oligomers boosts the affinity to the low nanomolar level. The dominant role of electrostatics is manifested kinetically as a steering force that accelerates the binding of BiP to E-peptide oligomers by approximately two orders of magnitude as compared against monomeric peptides. Electrostatic targeting of Hsp70 provides an explanation for why preferential binding has been observed for some aggregated clients but not others, as all the currently-documented cases in which Hsp70 binds aggregates with high-affinity involve clients that have an opposite charge to Hsp70.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.