Trial reportChest2022
Smartphone-Guided Self-prone Positioning vs Usual Care in Nonintubated Hospital Ward Patients With COVID-19: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Chest, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04344587 (Awake Prone Position for Early Hypoxemia in COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Awake Prone Position for Early Hypoxemia in COVID-19
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Awake prone positioning reduces mortality, intubation, and hospital stay in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 6,164 patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Awake prone position in COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of awake prone positioning in patients with covid-19 related hypoxemic respiratory failure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Pooled it
- Awake Prone Positioning in Patients With COVID-19 Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Prone positioning in ARDS.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- The effect of culture on the benefits of awake prone positioning for adults with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2025Article
- Advances in acute respiratory distress syndrome: focusing on heterogeneity, pathophysiology, and therapeutic strategies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- [Prone positioning for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults : Update on the physiological effects, indications and implementation].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2024Review
- When hope meets reality: the challenges of awake proning in unmonitored settings.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Awake prone positioning effectiveness in moderate to severe COVID-19 a randomized controlled trial.Wellcome open research · 2024Article
- Prone Positioning for Patients With COVID-19-Induced Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Flipping the Script.Respiratory care · 2023Review
- Barriers and facilitators of adherence to awake prone positioning: a qualitative study using the COM-B model.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Awake prone positioning in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Review
- At the intersection of trust and mistrust: A qualitative analysis of motivators and barriers to research participation at a safety-net hospital.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Awake Prone Positioning for Non-Intubated COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSafe, effective, and easily implementable treatments that reduce the progression of respiratory failure in COVID-19 are urgently needed. Despite the increased adoption of prone positioning during the pandemic, the effectiveness of this technique on progression of respiratory failure among nonintubated patients is unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the effectiveness of smartphone-guided self-prone positioning recommendations and instructions compared with usual care in reducing progression of respiratory failure among nonintubated patients with COVID-19? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsAwake Prone Position for Early Hypoxemia in COVID-19 (APPEX-19) is a multicenter randomized clinical trial that randomized nonintubated adults with COVID-19 on < 6 L/min of supplemental oxygen to receive a smartphone-guided self-prone positioning intervention or usual care. The primary outcome was the composite of respiratory deterioration (an increase in supplemental oxygen requirement) or ICU transfer. Using a Bayesian statistical approach, the posterior probability of superiority within each treatment arm (superiority threshold 95%) was calculated.
resultsThe trial was stopped early for slow enrollment. A total of 293 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (159 self-prone positioning intervention and 134 usual care). Among participants who self-reported body positioning (n = 139 [70 intervention, 69 usual care]), 71.4% in the intervention arm and 59.4% in the usual care arm attempted prone positioning. Thirty-one participants (posterior mean, 24.7%; 95% credible interval, 18.6-31.4) receiving usual care and 32 participants (posterior mean, 22.1%; 95% credible interval, 16.6-28.1) receiving the self-prone positioning intervention experienced the primary outcome; the posterior probability of superiority for the self-prone positioning intervention was 72.1%, less than the 95% threshold for superiority. Adverse events occurred in 26.9% of participants in the usual care arm and in 11.9% of participants in the intervention arm.
interpretationAmong nonintubated patients with COVID-19, smartphone-guided self-prone positioning recommendations and instructions did not promote strong adherence to prone positioning. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04344587; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.