ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2022
The role of primary and secondary delays in the effective resonance frequency of acoustically interacting microbubbles.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subharmonic resonance of phospholipid coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2024Article
- Resonance behaviors of encapsulated microbubbles oscillating nonlinearly with ultrasonic excitation.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2023Article
- Nanobubble Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: A Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acoustically excited microbubbles (MBs) are known to be nonlinear oscillators with complex dynamics. This has enabled their use in a wide range of applications from medicine to industry and underwater acoustics. To better utilize their potential in applications and possibly invent new ones a comprehensive understanding of their dynamics is required. In this work, we explore the effect of bubble-bubble interactions on the resonance frequency of MB suspensions. MBs oscillate in response to an external acoustic wave and since bubbles in a cluster are at different locations compared to the excitation source, they are excited at different times. In this work we refer to these delays as primary delays. Interactions between the scattered pressure fields from adjacent bubbles have also been shown to alter the dynamics of MBs that exist within clusters. These secondary waves generated by MBs reach MBs in their proximity at different times that depend on their spatial location in the cluster. Here we refer to these delays as secondary delays. Inclusion of the secondary delays modifies the class of the differential equations governing the oscillations of interacting MBs in a cluster from ordinary differential equations to neutral delay differential equations. Previous work has not considered the all the delays associated with the bubble distances when modeling the interactions between bubbles. In this work we investigate the effect of both the primary and secondary delays on the effective resonance frequency of MB clusters. It is shown that primary delays cause spreading the resonance frequency of identical MBs within a range where the closest MB to the acoustic source exhibits the lowest resonance frequency and the furthest MB resonates at the highest frequency. This range has been shown to be up to 0.12 MHz for the examples investigated in this work. The effect of secondary delays is shown to be very significant. In the absence of secondary delays, the ordinary differential equation model predicts a decrease of up to 26% in the resonance frequency of 4 identical interacting MBs as the inter-bubble distances are decreased. However, we show that inclusion of the secondary delays result in the increase of the resonance frequency of MBs if they are situated close to each other. This increase is shown to be significant and for the case of 4 identical interacting MBs we show an increase of 58% in the resonance frequency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.