ArticleThe oncologist2022
Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018.
Article in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Readministration of nivolumab for patients with advanced gastric cancer: a case series.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- VDAC1 protein derived from extracellular vesicles promotes paclitaxel resistance in gastric cancer through autophagy and mitophagy.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Article
- Increased treatment options and improved survival in real-world patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer from 2011 to 2023.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Conversion surgery following zolbetuximab-based chemotherapy for CLDN18.2-positive gastroesophageal junction cancer.International cancer conference journal · 2025Article
- A multicenter, prospective, observational study of nivolumab readministration for advanced gastric cancer (NIVO RETURNS).Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Clinical efficacy of nivolumab-based therapy for HER2-negative diffuse-type advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with peritoneal dissemination.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Impact of early tumor shrinkage on survival outcomes in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan in third- or later-line settings.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Investigating the role of immunotherapy for real-world patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer between 2011 and 2023.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of the prognostic nomogram model for patients with diffuse-type gastric cancer based on the SEER database.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer in Japan: A real-world analysis.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Real-world outcomes of trifluridine/tipiracil for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Nivolumab as Third- or Later-Line Treatment for HER2-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.Journal of gastric cancer · 2023Article
- Observational
- Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.Cureus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the past decade, several successful clinical trials provided new therapeutic agents approved for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study evaluated whether these practice-changing results actually altered the clinical practice. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of treatment-naive AGC patients who received combination chemotherapy of fluoropyrimidine and platinum between 2007 and 2018 and divided them into three groups: Groups A (2007-10), B (2011-14), and C (2015-2018), respectively. We compared the clinicopathological features, treatment details, and clinical outcomes among the three groups.
resultsIn total, 1004 consecutive patients were enrolled (A; n = 254, B; n = 300, and C; n = 450). The number of patients with poor performance status, older age, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, and primary tumor increased during the study period. All groups had similar median overall survival (OS); ~16 months) without any statistical difference but steady prolongation of survival was observed in the adjusted with imbalance prognostic factors among groups (B/A; hazard ratio, HR 0.82, 95% C.I 0.68-0.98, C/A; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86); OS of HER2-positive AGC patients was clearly improved (HER2-positive vs HER2-negative in Group B, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.06; Group C, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90) but that of diffuse-type AGC patients remained dismal.
conclusionsThe increasing availability of chemotherapy options potentially contributed to improved survival of AGC patients, but expanded chemotherapeutic indications made the survival benefit inconspicuous in the whole population. Future therapeutic development for the AGC subset not adequately receiving benefit from previous clinical trials is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.