Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596927›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2022

Antimicrobial resistance-Do we share more than companionship with our dogs?

Mari Røken, Kristin Forfang, Yngvild Wasteson, Anita Haug Haaland, Hans Geir Eiken, Snorre B Hagen, Ane Mohn Bjelland

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phylodynamics Uncovers the Transmission of Antibiotic-ResistantbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  10. First Belgian Report of Ertapenem Resistance in an ST11Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mari RøkenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7048-8572
Kristin ForfangDivision of Environment and Natural Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Ås, Norway.
Yngvild WastesonFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Anita Haug HaalandFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Hans Geir EikenDivision of Environment and Natural Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Ås, Norway.
Snorre B HagenDivision of Environment and Natural Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Ås, Norway.
Ane Mohn BjellandFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NONorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research · NO

Funding

Norges Miljø- og Biovitenskapelige UniversitetNORM 19_05Norwegian University of Life SciencesNorwegian University of Science and Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate and compare antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in faeces from cohabiting dogs and owners. METHODS AND

resultsDNA from faecal samples from 35 dogs and 35 owners was screened for the presence of 34 clinically relevant ARGs using high throughput qPCR. In total, 24 and 25 different ARGs were present in the dog and owner groups, respectively. The households had a mean of 9.9 ARGs present, with dogs and owners sharing on average 3.3 ARGs. ARGs were shared significantly more in households with dogs over 6 years old (3.5, interquartile range 2.75-5.0) than in households with younger dogs (2.5, interquartile range 2.0-3.0) (p = 0.02). Dogs possessed significantly more mecA and aminoglycoside resistance genes than owners.

conclusionsDogs and owners can act as reservoirs for a broad range of ARGs belonging to several antimicrobial resistance classes. A modest proportion of the same resistance genes were present in both dogs and owners simultaneously, indicating that ARG transmission between the dog and human gut is of minor concern in the absence of antimicrobial selection. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study provides insight into the common dog and human gut resistomes, contributing to an improved knowledge base in risk assessments regarding ARG transmission between dogs and humans.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAnimalsDogsDrug Resistance, BacterialFecesHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantimicrobial resistance genesdogfaecal resistomehigh throughput qPCRhumanone health

Identifiers

PMID35596927
PMCPMC9542740
OpenAlexW4281250574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.