Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596903›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2022

Can physiological stimulation prior to ileostomy closure reduce postoperative ileus? A prospective multicenter pilot study.

J Ocaña, J C García-Pérez, M Labalde-Martínez, G Rodríguez-Velasco, I Moreno, A Vivas, I Clemente-Esteban, A Ballestero, P Abadía, E Ferrero and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06974500 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of an Efferent Loop Stimulation Protocol Prior to Ileostomy Closure at La Paz University Hospital

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital Universitario La PazRan2025 to 2027Enrolled68ConditionsPostoperative Ileus, Colorectal Cancer Control and Prevention, Stoma - IleostomyArmsDaily efferent limb stimulation for at least two weeks prior to surgery using saline solution and a thickering agent
NCT07640113 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The STIMIC Trial: A Multicenter Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Impact of Ambulatory Physiological Stimulation of the Efferent Limb Prior to Ileostomy Closure on Colorectal Microbiota Composition and Histopathological Findings

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRan2026 to 2028Enrolled90ConditionsIleostomy Stoma, Stoma Stimulation, Microbiome AnalysisArmsSerum stimulation, Physiological stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J OcañaDivision of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain. jocajim@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5158-7006
J C García-PérezDivision of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
M Labalde-MartínezDivision of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
G Rodríguez-VelascoDivision of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
I MorenoDivision of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
A VivasDivision of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
I Clemente-EstebanStomatherapist at Ramon Y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
A BallesteroDivision of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
P AbadíaDivision of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
E FerreroDivision of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
J M Fernández-CebriánDivision of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
J DieDivision of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto Cajal · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of ileostomy closure following preoperative physiological stimulation (PPS) on postoperative ileus (POI) in patients with loop ileostomy after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

methodsPatients who underwent ileostomy closure between January 2017 and February 2020 in two tertiary referral centers were prospectively included. PPS stimulation was compared to standard treatment. Stimulation was carried out daily during the 15 days prior to ileostomy closure by the patient's self-instillation of 200 ml of fecal contents from the ileostomy bag via the efferent loop, using a rectal catheter. Standard treatment (ST) consisted of observation. Outcomes measures were POI, morbidity, stimulation feasibility, and predictors to ileus.

resultsA total of 58 patients were included [42 males and 16 females, median age 67 (43-85) years]. PPS was used in 24 patients, who completed the entire stimulation process, and ST in 34 patients. No differences in preoperative factors were found between the two groups. POI was significantly lower in the PPS group (4.2%) vs the ST group (32.4%); p < 0.01, OR: 0.05 (CI 95% 0.01-0.65). The PPS group had a shorter time to restoration of bowel function (1 day vs 3 days) p = 0.02 and a shorter time to tolerance of liquids (1 day vs 2 days), p = 0.04. Age (p = 0.01), open approach at index surgery, p = 0.03, adjuvant capecitabine (p = 0.01). and previous abdominal surgeries (p = 0.02) were associated with POI in the multivariate analysis. C-reactive-protein values on the 3rd (p = 0.02) and 5th (p < 0.01) postoperative day were also associated with POI.

conclusionsPPS for patients who underwent ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer is feasible and might reduce POI.

Indexed as

IleusRectal NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansIleostomyMalePilot ProjectsPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsIleostomy closurePhysiological stimulationPostoperative ileusPreoperative stimulationRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID35596903
OpenAlexW4281258326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.