Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596851›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2022

Neural Networks to Recognize Patterns in Topographic Images of Cortical Electrical Activity of Patients with Neurological Diseases.

Francisco Gerson A de Meneses, Ariel Soares Teles, Monara Nunes, Daniel da Silva Farias, Silmar Teixeira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francisco Gerson A de MenesesNeuroinnovation Technology & Brain Mapping Laboratory, Federal University of the Parnaíba Delta, Av. São Sebastião, 2819 - Bairro São Benedito, Parnaíba, Piauí, CEP: 64202-020, Brazil. gerson@ifpi.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0002-5242-9656
Ariel Soares TelesNeuroinnovation Technology & Brain Mapping Laboratory, Federal University of the Parnaíba Delta, Av. São Sebastião, 2819 - Bairro São Benedito, Parnaíba, Piauí, CEP: 64202-020, Brazil.
Monara NunesNeuroinnovation Technology & Brain Mapping Laboratory, Federal University of the Parnaíba Delta, Av. São Sebastião, 2819 - Bairro São Benedito, Parnaíba, Piauí, CEP: 64202-020, Brazil.
Daniel da Silva FariasNeuroinnovation Technology & Brain Mapping Laboratory, Federal University of the Parnaíba Delta, Av. São Sebastião, 2819 - Bairro São Benedito, Parnaíba, Piauí, CEP: 64202-020, Brazil.
Silmar TeixeiraNeuroinnovation Technology & Brain Mapping Laboratory, Federal University of the Parnaíba Delta, Av. São Sebastião, 2819 - Bairro São Benedito, Parnaíba, Piauí, CEP: 64202-020, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal do Piauí · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Software such as EEGLab has enabled the treatment and visualization of the tracing and cortical topography of the electroencephalography (EEG) signals. In particular, the topography of the cortical electrical activity is represented by colors, which make it possible to identify functional differences between cortical areas and to associate them with various diseases. The use of cortical topography with EEG origin in the investigation of diseases is often not used due to the representation of colors making it difficult to classify the disease. Thus, the analyses have been carried out, mainly, based on the EEG tracings. Therefore, a computer system that recognizes disease patterns through cortical topography can be a solution to the diagnostic aid. In view of this, this study compared five models of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), namely: Inception v3, SqueezeNet, LeNet, VGG-16 and VGG-19, in order to know the patterns in cortical topography images obtained with EEG, in Parkinson's disease, Depression and Bipolar Disorder. SqueezeNet performed better in the 3 diseases analyzed, with Parkinson's disease being better evaluated for Accuracy (88.89%), Precison (86.36%), Recall (91.94%) and F1 Score (89.06%), the other CNNs had less performance. In the analysis of the values of the Area under ROC Curve (AUC), SqueezeNet reached (93.90%) for Parkinson's disease, (75.70%) for Depression and (72.10%) for Bipolar Disorder. We understand that there is the possibility of classifying neurological diseases from cortical topographies with the use of CNNs and, thus, creating a computational basis for the implementation of software for screening and possible diagnostic assistance.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseElectroencephalographyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerConvolutional neural networkCortical topographicEEGPattern recognition

Identifiers

PMID35596851
OpenAlexW4281252514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.