Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596800›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

A deep learning framework for vertebral morphometry and Cobb angle measurement with external validation.

Danis Alukaev, Semen Kiselev, Tamerlan Mustafaev, Ahatov Ainur, Bulat Ibragimov, Tomaž Vrtovec

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computed Tomography-Based Morphometric Analysis of the Thoracolumbar Junction in the Young Turkish Population.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [Development and validation of an automatic diagnostic tool for lumbar stability based on deep learning].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  15. A deep learning framework for vertebral morphometry and Cobb angle measurement with external validation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Danis AlukaevAI Lab, Innopolis University, Universitetskaya St 1, 420500, Innopolis, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation.
Semen KiselevAI Lab, Innopolis University, Universitetskaya St 1, 420500, Innopolis, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation.
Tamerlan MustafaevAI Lab, Innopolis University, Universitetskaya St 1, 420500, Innopolis, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation.
Ahatov AinurBarsmed Diagnostic Center, Daurskaya 12, 42000, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation.
Bulat IbragimovDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 1, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7739-7788
Tomaž VrtovecLaboratory of Imaging Technologies, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. tomaz.vrtovec@fe.uni-lj.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6625-0307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo propose a fully automated deep learning (DL) framework for the vertebral morphometry and Cobb angle measurement from three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) images of the spine, and validate the proposed framework on an external database.

methodsThe vertebrae were first localized and segmented in each 3D CT image using a DL architecture based on an ensemble of U-Nets, and then automated vertebral morphometry in the form of vertebral body (VB) and intervertebral disk (IVD) heights, and spinal curvature measurements in the form of coronal and sagittal Cobb angles (thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis) were performed using dedicated machine learning techniques. The framework was trained on 1725 vertebrae from 160 CT images and validated on an external database of 157 vertebrae from 15 CT images.

resultsThe resulting mean absolute errors (± standard deviation) between the obtained DL and corresponding manual measurements were 1.17 ± 0.40 mm for VB heights, 0.54 ± 0.21 mm for IVD heights, and 3.42 ± 1.36° for coronal and sagittal Cobb angles, with respective maximal absolute errors of 2.51 mm, 1.64 mm, and 5.52°. Linear regression revealed excellent agreement, with Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.943, 0.928, and 0.996, respectively.

conclusionThe obtained results are within the range of values, obtained by existing DL approaches without external validation. The results therefore confirm the scalability of the proposed DL framework from the perspective of application to external data, and time and computational resource consumption required for framework training.

Indexed as

Deep LearningKyphosisLordosisScoliosisHumansLumbar VertebraeThoracic VertebraeArtificial intelligenceCobb angleComputed tomographyDeep learningSpineVertebral morphometry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.