Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596789›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2022

Considering Fish as Recipients of Ecosystem Services Provides a Framework to Formally Link Baseline, Development, and Post-operational Monitoring Programs and Improve Aquatic Impact Assessments for Large Scale Developments.

Carolyn J M Brown, R Allen Curry, Michelle A Gray, Jennifer Lento, Deborah L MacLatchy, Wendy A Monk, Scott A Pavey, André St-Hilaire, Bernhard Wegscheider, Kelly R Munkittrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carolyn J M BrownDepartment of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
R Allen CurryCanadian Rivers Institute, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Michelle A GrayCanadian Rivers Institute, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Jennifer LentoCanadian Rivers Institute, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Deborah L MacLatchyDepartment of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Wendy A MonkEnvironment and Climate Change Canada @ Canadian Rivers Institute, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Scott A PaveyDepartment of Biological Sciences and Canadian Rivers Institute, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.
André St-HilaireCanadian Rivers Institute, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Bernhard WegscheiderCanadian Rivers Institute, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Kelly R MunkittrickCanadian Rivers Institute, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada. kelly.munkittrick@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most countries, major development projects must satisfy an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process that considers positive and negative aspects to determine if it meets environmental standards and appropriately mitigates or offsets negative impacts on the values being considered. The benefits of before-after-control-impact monitoring designs have been widely known for more than 30 years, but most development assessments fail to effectively link pre- and post-development monitoring in a meaningful way. Fish are a common component of EIA evaluation for both socioeconomic and scientific reasons. The Ecosystem Services (ES) concept was developed to describe the ecosystem attributes that benefit humans, and it offers the opportunity to develop a framework for EIA that is centred around the needs of and benefits from fish. Focusing an environmental monitoring framework on the critical needs of fish could serve to better align risk, development, and monitoring assessment processes. We define the ES that fish provide in the context of two common ES frameworks. To allow for linkages between environmental assessment and the ES concept, we describe critical ecosystem functions from a fish perspective to highlight potential monitoring targets that relate to fish abundance, diversity, health, and habitat. Finally, we suggest how this framing of a monitoring process can be used to better align aquatic monitoring programs across pre-development, development, and post-operational monitoring programs.

Indexed as

EcosystemFishesAnimalsEnvironmentEnvironmental MonitoringEcosystem attributesEcosystem servicesEnvironmental impact assessmentEnvironmental monitoringFishRelevant endpoints

Identifiers

PMID35596789
PMCPMC9252955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.