Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596714›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2022

Using the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale in clinical trials: construct validity, interpretability, reliability and acceptability.

Jonathan M Batchelor, Sonia Gran, Paul Leighton, Laura Howells, Alan A Montgomery, Wei Tan, Isma Ahmed, Kim S Thomas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Scoring Systems in Vitiligo-A Narrative Review.Indian dermatology online journal · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan M BatchelorCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7728-2021
Sonia GranCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2443-5100
Paul LeightonCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5208-0274
Laura HowellsCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4157-7394
Alan A MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0450-1606
Wei TanNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8037-240X
Isma AhmedCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kim S ThomasCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7785-7465
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValidated outcome measures are needed for vitiligo trials.

objectivesTo assess construct validity, interpretability, reliability and acceptability of the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS).

methodsWe used images of vitiligo before and after treatment, plus outcome data, from the HI-Light Vitiligo trial. We compared outcome assessments made by trial participants with assessments of images by clinicians and people with vitiligo who were not trial participants [Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) panel]. Hypothesis testing assessed psychometric properties of the VNS, with κ statistics to assess agreement between outcomes. Three focus groups and two online discussion groups provided insight into the use of VNS by people with vitiligo.

resultsOur hypothesis of a positive association between VNS and participant-reported global treatment success was supported for trial participants (κ = 0·41 if VNS success was defined as ≥ 4; κ = 0·71 if VNS success was defined as ≥ 3), but not for the blinded PPI panel (κ = 0·28). As hypothesized, the association with participant-reported global success was higher for VNS (κ = 0·41) than for clinician-reported percentage repigmentation (κ = 0·17). Seventy-five per cent of trial participants valued a VNS of 3 (partial response) as a treatment success. Test-retest reliability was good: κ = 0·69 (95% confidence interval 0·63-0·74). Age and skin phototype did not influence interpretation of the VNS scores. To people with vitiligo, the VNS is an acceptable and meaningful patient-reported outcome measure.

conclusionsTrial participants may assess their vitiligo differently compared with blinded assessors. A VNS score of 3 may be more highly valued by people undergoing vitiligo treatment than was previously thought. What is already known about this topic? Vitiligo is a common condition, and can have a considerable psychological impact. A Vitiligo Core Outcome Set is being developed, to enable the results of vitiligo trials to be compared and combined more easily. The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) developed in partnership with people with vitiligo; initial validation studies have been promising. What does this study add? The VNS shows good construct validity, reliability and acceptability; it can be used in all ages and skin phototypes. All five levels of the VNS scale should be reported for transparency, to aid interpretation of trial findings, and to facilitate meta-analysis in systematic reviews. VNS assessments made by trial participants and independent observers are likely to be qualitatively different, making blinded assessment of VNS by independent observers difficult to interpret. Blinding of participants to trial interventions is recommended whenever possible. What are the clinical implications of the work? The VNS can be used as a PROM to assess the cosmetic acceptability of repigmentation at individual patches of vitiligo. A VNS score of 3 or more is likely to be valued by patients as a treatment success.

Indexed as

VitiligoClinical Trials as TopicHumansReproducibility of ResultsSkinSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35596714
PMCPMC9796274
OpenAlexW4281250795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.