Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596667›Full record

ArticleMuscle & nerve2022

Patient preference for virtual versus in-person visits in neuromuscular clinical practice.

Komal Hafeez, Hani Kushlaf, Husam Al-Sultani, Anny-Claude Joseph, Zoya Zaeem, Zaeem Siddiqi, Shannon Laboy, Michael Pulley, Ali A Habib, Nathaniel M Robbins and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscle & nerve, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Experience with telemedicine in neuromuscular clinic during COVID-19 pandemic.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Komal HafeezBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hani KushlafUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3786-1133
Husam Al-SultaniBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0444-7566
Anny-Claude JosephWest Point US Military Academy, West Point, New York, USA.
Zoya ZaeemUniversity of Alberta, Canada, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Zaeem SiddiqiUniversity of Alberta, Canada, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2421-8381
Shannon LaboyUniversity of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Michael PulleyUniversity of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Ali A HabibUniversity of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Nathaniel M RobbinsGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1884-8275
Sean ZadehGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Muhammad Ubaid HafeezBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.
Yessar HussainAustin Neuromuscular Center, Austin, Texas, USA.
Alexandria Melendez-ZaidiBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.
Charles KassardjianUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Kristin JohnsonOchsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Holly LeonhardOchsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Suur BilicilerUT Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jorge E Patino MurillasUT Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Aziz I ShaibaniBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

aimsIt is unknown if patients with neuromuscular diseases prefer in-person or virtual telemedicine visits. We studied patient opinions and preference on virtual versus in-person visits, and the factors influencing such preferences.

methodsTelephone surveys, consisting of 11 questions, of patients from 10 neuromuscular centers were completed.

resultsFive hundred and twenty surveys were completed. Twenty-six percent of respondents preferred virtual visits, while 50% preferred in-person visits. Sixty-four percent reported physical interaction as "very important." For receiving a new diagnosis, 55% preferred in-person vs 35% reporting no preference. Forty percent were concerned about a lack of physical examination vs 20% who were concerned about evaluating vital signs. Eighty four percent reported virtual visits were sufficiently private. Sixty eight percent did not consider expenses a factor in their preference. Although 92% were comfortable with virtual communication technology, 55% preferred video communications, and 19% preferred phone calls. Visit preference was not significantly associated with gender, diagnosis, disease severity, or symptom management. Patients who were concerned about a lack of physical exam or assessment of vitals had significantly higher odds of selecting in-person visits than no preference. DISCUSSION: Although neither technology, privacy, nor finance burdened patients in our study, more patients preferred in-person visits than virtual visits and 40% were concerned about a lack of physical examination. Interactions that occur with in-person encounters had high importance for patients, reflecting differences in the perception of the patient-physician relationship between virtual and in-person visits.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceTelemedicineCommunicationHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19in-personneuromuscularpreferencetelemedicinevirtual

Identifiers

PMID35596667
PMCPMC9540760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.