Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596655›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2023

Australian women's information-seeking preferences and needs in preparation for pregnancy.

Adina Y Lang, Cheryce L Harrison, Jacqueline A Boyle

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Australian women's information-seeking preferences and needs in preparation for pregnancy.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adina Y LangMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2923-0016
Cheryce L HarrisonMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3154-4946
Jacqueline A BoyleMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3616-1637
Monash University · AU

Funding

Medibank Private Limited provided funding and in-kind support to enable study recruitment. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedThe preconception period provides opportunities for health behaviour optimisation for improved maternal and child well-being. However, preconception information sources women engage with are not well-known.

methodsTo address this gap, the current cross-sectional study retrospectively explored (1) preconception information or advice accessed on recommended preconception health topics and (2) preferred sources of preconception information amongst pregnant women receiving care through Australian public and private maternity settings.

resultsOverall, 78% of women reported accessing any preconception health information, predominantly concerning achieving/maintaining a healthy weight, diet, folic acid and multivitamin supplementation. Preferred information sources included health professionals, e.g. general practitioners (74%) and the internet (66%), although source engagement varied.

conclusionsWhilst women predominantly prefer seeking preconception health information from health professionals and the internet, multi-modal resources are needed to reach women and enhance engagement with evidence-based information and healthcare in preparation for pregnancy. SO WHAT?: Evaluation of preconception health resources for women and health professionals is warranted, appraising their adequacy in supporting engagement with key preconception health messages. In particular, assessment of the quality, readability and evidence-base of online resources is needed. Our findings highlight the need for public health experts to take action to raise awareness amongst women of the importance of preconception health, encourage health professional engagement for preconception care and direct women to more appropriate evidence-based online resources.

Indexed as

Information Seeking BehaviorPreconception CareAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective Studieshealth educationmaternal healthpregnancywomen's health

Identifiers

PMID35596655
PMCPMC10087491
OpenAlexW4281250340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.