Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596536›Full record

ArticleNursing & health sciences2022

Frameworks for the design, implementation, and evaluation of simulation-based nursing education: A scoping review.

David Abdulai Salifu, Christmal Dela Christmals, Gerda Marie Reitsma

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07653308 (The Effect of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Scenario-Based Simulation Training on Nursing Students' Perceived Stress, Learning Satisfaction, Self-Confidence, and Simulation-Based Learning), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07653308 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Scenario-Based Simulation Training on Nursing Students' Perceived Stress, Learning Satisfaction, Self-Confidence, and Simulation-Based Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtılım UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled18ConditionsNursing Education, Simulation Based Learning, Stress, Psychological, Nursing StudentsArmsNICU Scenario-Based Simulation Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David Abdulai SalifuCentre for Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-3170
Christmal Dela ChristmalsCentre for Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1811-0008
Gerda Marie ReitsmaCentre for Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0569-6823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review was conducted to identify and describe constructs of frameworks and theories used to guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of simulation in nursing education globally, with a focus on their applicability in low-resource settings. Six electronic databases, three of which were on EBSCO Host (CINAHL, MEDLINE, ERIC), PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest, as well as Google Scholar, were searched to retrieve studies published in the English language between 2012 and February 2022. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist, and was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's five-step scoping review methodological framework. Data were extracted from five studies (four frameworks and a theory) and narratively synthesized. Hence, seven constructs were identified and described: context, background, simulation design, educational practices, facilitator, participant, and outcomes. The four frameworks and theory were developed in the context of developed countries, which reveals the lack of a context-specific framework to guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of simulation in nursing education in low-resource settings. Given resource limitations and the apparent gaps in applying simulation-based framework(s) developed in developed countries to low-resource settings, the findings of this review underscored the need for a context-specific framework that is locally tailored to the needs and resources of low-resource settings, to promote access to and use of simulation in enhancing student learning, and the development of clinical competence.

Indexed as

Education, NursingClinical CompetenceHumansStudentsclinical competenceclinical educationlow-resource settingnursingnursing educationsimulationsimulation-based frameworksimulation theory

Identifiers

PMID35596536
PMCPMC9540896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.