Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596227›Full record

ArticleCanine medicine and genetics2022

Dog olfactory receptor gene expression profiling using samples derived from nasal epithelium brushing.

Naoual Azzouzi, Anne-Sophie Guillory, Gilles Chaudieu, Francis Galibert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canine medicine and genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of Olfaction in Dogs: Evolution, Biology, and Human-Oriented Work.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. On the Cranial Nerves.NeuroSci · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naoual AzzouziUMR6290 IGDR (Institut de Génétique Et Développement de Rennes), Université de Rennes 1, CNRS, 35000, Rennes, France.
Anne-Sophie GuilloryUMR6290 IGDR (Institut de Génétique Et Développement de Rennes), Université de Rennes 1, CNRS, 35000, Rennes, France.
Gilles ChaudieuClinique Vétérinaire Pole Santé Chanturgue, 63100, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Francis GalibertUMR6290 IGDR (Institut de Génétique Et Développement de Rennes), Université de Rennes 1, CNRS, 35000, Rennes, France. galibert@univ-rennes1.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9596-9815
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs have an exquisite sense of olfaction. In many instances this ability has been utilized by humans for a wide range of important situations including detecting explosives and illegal drugs. It is accepted that some breeds have better senses of smell than others. Dogs can detect many volatile compounds at extremely low concentrations in air. To achieve such high levels of detection, the canine olfactory system is both complex and highly developed requiring a high density of olfactory receptors capable of detecting volatiles. Consequently the dog genome encodes a large number of olfactory receptor (OR) genes. However, it remains unclear as to what extent are all of these OR genes expressed on the cell surface. To facilitate such studies, a nasal brushing method was developed to recover dog nasal epithelial cell samples from which total RNA could be extracted and used to prepare high quality cDNA libraries. After capture by hybridization with an extensive set of oligonucleotides, the level of expression of each transcript was measured following next generation sequencing (NGS). The reproducibility of this sampling approach was checked by analyzing replicate samples from the same animal (up to 6 per each naris). The quality of the hybridization capture was also checked by analyzing two DNA libraries; this offered an advantage over RNA libraries by having an equal presence for each gene. Finally, we compared this brushing method performed on living dogs to a nasal epithelium biopsy approach applied to two euthanized terminally ill dogs, following consent from their owners.Comparison the expression levels of each transcript indicate that the ratios of expression between the highest and the least expressed OR in each sample are greater than 10,000 (paralog variation). Furthermore, it was clear that a number of OR genes are not expressed.The method developed and described here will allow researchers to further address whether variations observed in the OR transcriptome relate to dog 'life experiences' and whether any differences observed between samples are dog-specific or breed-specific.

Identifiers

PMID35596227
PMCPMC9121576
OpenAlexW4280640511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.