Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596213›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2022

Real-world study of multiple naloxone administration for opioid overdose reversal among bystanders.

Randa Abdelal, A Raja Banerjee, Suzanne Carlberg-Racich, Neyla Darwaza, Diane Ito, Jessica Shoaff, Josh Epstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development ofPharmaceutics · 2024
    Review
  15. Naloxone distribution programs in the emergency department: A scoping review of the literature.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Randa AbdelalHikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., 200 Connell Drive, 4th Floor, Berkeley Heights, NJ, 07922, USA. rabdelal@hikma.com.
A Raja BanerjeeHikma Specialty USA Inc., Berkeley Heights, NJ, USA.
Suzanne Carlberg-RacichDePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Neyla DarwazaHikma Pharmaceuticals LLC, Amman, Jordan.
Diane ItoStratevi, LLC, Santa Monica, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1396-7395
Jessica ShoaffStratevi, LLC, Boston, MA, USA.
Josh EpsteinStratevi, LLC, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
DePaul University · USHikma Pharmaceuticals (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing prevalence of highly potent, illicitly manufactured fentanyl and its analogues (IMF) in the USA is exacerbating the opioid epidemic which has worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Narcan® (naloxone HCl) Nasal Spray has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as a treatment for opioid-related overdoses. Due to the high potency of IMF, multiple naloxone administrations (MNA) may be needed per overdose event. It is essential to determine the patterns of naloxone use, including MNA, and preferences among bystanders who have used naloxone for opioid overdose reversal.

methodsA cross-sectional web-based survey was administered to 125 adult US residents who administered 4 mg Narcan® Nasal Spray during an opioid overdose in the past year. The survey asked about the most recent overdose event, the use of Narcan® during the event and the associated withdrawal symptoms, and participant preferences regarding dosages of naloxone nasal spray. An open-ended voice survey was completed by 35 participants.

resultsParticipants were mostly female (70%) and white (78%), while reported overdose events most frequently occurred in people who were males (54%) and white (86%). Most events (95%) were successfully reversed, with 78% using ≥ 2 doses and 30% using ≥ 3 doses of Narcan® Nasal Spray. Over 90% were worried that 1 Narcan® box may not be enough for a successful future reversal. Reported withdrawal symptoms were similar in overdose events where 1 versus ≥ 2 sprays were given. Eighty-six percent of participants reported more confidence in an 8 mg versus a 4 mg naloxone nasal spray and 77% reported a stronger preference for 8 mg over 4 mg.

conclusionsMNA occurred in most overdose events, often involving more sprays than are provided in one Narcan® nasal spray box, and participants predominantly expressed having a stronger preference for and confidence in an 8 mg compared to a 4 mg nasal spray. This suggests the need and desire for a higher dose naloxone nasal spray formulation option. Given that bystanders may be the first to administer naloxone to someone experiencing an opioid overdose, ensuring access to an adequate naloxone supply is critical in addressing the opioid overdose epidemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug OverdoseOpiate OverdoseSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNasal SpraysPandemicsAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNasal SpraysBystanderCOVID-19DosingFentanylLaypersonMultiple naloxone administrationsNaloxoneNarcanOpioid overdoseSynthetic opioid

Identifiers

PMID35596213
PMCPMC9122081
OpenAlexW4281252938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.