Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596177›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2022

Machine learning and comparative genomics approaches for the discovery of xylose transporters in yeast.

Mateus Bernabe Fiamenghi, João Gabriel Ribeiro Bueno, Antônio Pedro Camargo, Guilherme Borelli, Marcelo Falsarella Carazzolle, Gonçalo Amarante Guimarães Pereira, Leandro Vieira Dos Santos, Juliana José

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mateus Bernabe FiamenghiGenomics and Bioenergy Laboratory (LGE), Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
João Gabriel Ribeiro BuenoGenetics and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Antônio Pedro CamargoGenomics and Bioenergy Laboratory (LGE), Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Guilherme BorelliGenomics and Bioenergy Laboratory (LGE), Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Marcelo Falsarella CarazzolleGenomics and Bioenergy Laboratory (LGE), Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Gonçalo Amarante Guimarães PereiraGenomics and Bioenergy Laboratory (LGE), Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil. goncalo@unicamp.br.
Leandro Vieira Dos SantosGenetics and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Juliana JoséGenomics and Bioenergy Laboratory (LGE), Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.502245/2020-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need to mitigate and substitute the use of fossil fuels as the main energy matrix has led to the study and development of biofuels as an alternative. Second-generation (2G) ethanol arises as one biofuel with great potential, due to not only maintaining food security, but also as a product from economically interesting crops such as energy-cane. One of the main challenges of 2G ethanol is the inefficient uptake of pentose sugars by industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the main organism used for ethanol production. Understanding the main drivers for xylose assimilation and identify novel and efficient transporters is a key step to make the 2G process economically viable.

resultsBy implementing a strategy of searching for present motifs that may be responsible for xylose transport and past adaptations of sugar transporters in xylose fermenting species, we obtained a classifying model which was successfully used to select four different candidate transporters for evaluation in the S. cerevisiae hxt-null strain, EBY.VW4000, harbouring the xylose consumption pathway. Yeast cells expressing the transporters SpX, SpH and SpG showed a superior uptake performance in xylose compared to traditional literature control Gxf1.

conclusionsModelling xylose transport with the small data available for yeast and bacteria proved a challenge that was overcome through different statistical strategies. Through this strategy, we present four novel xylose transporters which expands the repertoire of candidates targeting yeast genetic engineering for industrial fermentation. The repeated use of the model for characterizing new transporters will be useful both into finding the best candidates for industrial utilization and to increase the model's predictive capabilities.

Indexed as

Feature selectionIndustrial biotechnologyMachine learningPentose metabolismXyloseXylose transporter

Identifiers

PMID35596177
PMCPMC9123741
OpenAlexW4281261103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.