ArticleBMC medical education2022
How far has the digitization of medical teaching progressed in times of COVID-19? A multinational survey among medical students and lecturers in German-speaking central Europe.
Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence of the effectiveness of projects, programs, and/or strategies for curricular innovation in undergraduate health courses: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Raising medical students' awareness for the interdependence between oral health and systemic diseases - evaluation of a problem-based learning intervention: an exploratory pilot study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Medical and Biomedical Students' Perspective on Digital Health and Its Integration in Medical Curricula: Recent and Future Views.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Microscopy without a microscope? Opportunities and limitations of dental studies in anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2025Article
- Flexner's legacy and the future of medical education: Embracing challenge and opportunity.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- A Two-Country Questionnaire Study of Biomedical Student Opinions Regarding Online Teaching During COVID-19.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Preferences Regarding Information Strategies for Digital Mental Health Interventions Among Medical Students: Discrete Choice Experiment.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Hybrid teaching after COVID-19: advantages, challenges and optimization strategies.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- The state of health professions students' self-directed learning ability during online study and the factors that influence it.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Veterinary teaching in COVID-19 times: perspectives of university teaching staff.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Developing as health professionals through community volunteering: exploring the value of a partnership between medical students and primary schools online compared to in-person.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Screen-based digital learning methods in radiation oncology and medical education.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Digitalization in Medicine: Are German Medical Students Well Prepared for the Future?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Student teachers' perceived changes of learning conditions during COVID-19: The role of internal resource management strategies, intrinsic motivation, and preferences for lesson formats.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo ensure successful medical education despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the demand for online instruction has substantially increased. Fast and efficient teaching in a digital format poses a great challenge for medical students and lecturers as well as the universities.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to capture the readiness of medical students and faculty members to participate in rapidly- evolving online education.
methodsThis cross-sectional study is based on two questionnaires distributed among medical students and associate deans for education in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Questions included decision- making questions, categorical questions, and open-ended questions, all addressing the frequency and format of the digital education offered, the perceived quality of digital education, and medical student satisfaction with digital education. Questions about missing content and areas for improvement from the perspectives of medical students were included. The associate deans were asked for their opinions about the impact of the pandemic on teaching, the organizational setup and implementation of digital education by universities, and plans for future initiatives.
resultsThree thousand and thirty medical students (m = 752 and f = 2245) from 53 universities participated in the study. The study showed that 92% of students were affected by the pandemic, and 19% of the students viewed the changes as entirely negative. 97% of the medical students were able to participate in digital courses, but only 4% were able to learn exclusively online. For 77% of the medical students, digital offerings accounted for over 80% of the education offered. In terms of content, medical students complained about a lack of practical teaching, such as contact with patients, lecturers, fellow medical students, and a poor perceived quality of teaching due to dubbing, frequent changeover of seminars, problem-oriented learning groups and in-person teaching, a lack of interaction possibilities and a lack of technical equipment, such as lecturers' knowledge and server capacities, at the universities. Overall, almost half of the medical students (42%) rated the implementation of digital teaching at their universities as good or very good. Forty-one of the 53 associate deans responded to the questionnaire, and 35 felt medical education was influenced by the pandemic. The associate deans (80%; 33/41) felt that the digitalization of medical education was negatively influenced by the pandemic. Only 44% (18/41) felt that their universities were well or very well positioned for digital teaching. All the associate deans believe that digital teaching in medicine will continue after the pandemic.
conclusionsIn the German-speaking world, the rapid conversion of medical teaching to a digital format has been well implemented in many cases. The perceived quality of the implementation of digital education still lacks practical relevance and the use of new digital media, such as learning games, VR, and online question time. The digital format of medical education will likely continue beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.