ArticleBMC medical imaging2022
WBC image classification and generative models based on convolutional neural network.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Validation of the MC-80 Digital Morphology Analyzer in Leukocyte Classification: A Large-Scale Comparison With Manual Microscopy.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Article
- Advancing WBC Classification: A Hybrid ConvNextV2-Swin Transformer Framework with R3GAN Data Balancing and CLAHE Preprocessing.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Raman spectroscopy combined with multiple technologies for label-free identification of immune cells: An overview.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026Review
- Multicentric data challenge for artificial intelligence-based classification of leukocytes: results from the CytologIA consortium.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- AI driven network pharmacology: Multi-scale mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine from molecular to patient analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- [Chinese expert consensus on the technical and clinical practice specifications of artificial intelligence assisted morphology examination of blood cells (2024)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2024Article
- ALL classification using neural ensemble and memetic deep feature optimization.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Blood cell image segmentation and classification: a systematic review.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Automated fundus ultrasound image classification based on siamese convolutional neural networks with multi-attention.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Leukocytes Classification for Leukemia Detection Using Quantum Inspired Deep Feature Selection.Cancers · 2023Article
- White Blood Cells Classification Using Entropy-Controlled Deep Features Optimization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- BCNet: A Deep Learning Computer-Aided Diagnosis Framework for Human Peripheral Blood Cell Identification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Empowering healthcare professionals with no-code artificial intelligence platforms for model development, a practical demonstration for pathology.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputer-aided methods for analyzing white blood cells (WBC) are popular due to the complexity of the manual alternatives. Recent works have shown highly accurate segmentation and detection of white blood cells from microscopic blood images. However, the classification of the observed cells is still a challenge, in part due to the distribution of the five types that affect the condition of the immune system.
methods(i) This work proposes W-Net, a CNN-based method for WBC classification. We evaluate W-Net on a real-world large-scale dataset that includes 6562 real images of the five WBC types. (ii) For further benefits, we generate synthetic WBC images using Generative Adversarial Network to be used for education and research purposes through sharing.
results(i) W-Net achieves an average accuracy of 97%. In comparison to state-of-the-art methods in the field of WBC classification, we show that W-Net outperforms other CNN- and RNN-based model architectures. Moreover, we show the benefits of using pre-trained W-Net in a transfer learning context when fine-tuned to specific task or accommodating another dataset. (ii) The synthetic WBC images are confirmed by experiments and a domain expert to have a high degree of similarity to the original images. The pre-trained W-Net and the generated WBC dataset are available for the community to facilitate reproducibility and follow up research work.
conclusionThis work proposed W-Net, a CNN-based architecture with a small number of layers, to accurately classify the five WBC types. We evaluated W-Net on a real-world large-scale dataset and addressed several challenges such as the transfer learning property and the class imbalance. W-Net achieved an average classification accuracy of 97%. We synthesized a dataset of new WBC image samples using DCGAN, which we released to the public for education and research purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.