Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596102›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational rehabilitation2022

Work-related support in clinical care for patients with a chronic disease: development of an intervention.

Maarten Butink, Desiree Dona, Annelies Boonen, Marlies Peters, Vera Baadjou, Theo Senden, Angelique de Rijk

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maarten ButinkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.butink@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-5999-9782
Desiree DonaDepartment of Human Resources/Occupational Health Services, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3255-6949
Annelies BoonenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0682-9533
Marlies PetersDepartment of Human Resources/Occupational Health Services, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2459-3838
Vera BaadjouAdelante Rehabilitation Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7864-1938
Theo SendenDepartment of Human Resources/Occupational Health Services, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Angelique de RijkDepartment of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-0629
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLMaastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with a chronic disease are more vulnerable in the labor market, and work-related support in clinical care would enhance the timely support greatly needed in each phase of their working life. This paper describes the development of a generic stay-at-work intervention to provide work-related support in clinical care to patients with a chronic disease.

methodsSteps 1-4 of Intervention Mapping (IM) were combined with action research principles. A needs assessment (Step 1) involved the project group formation, a literature review, qualitative studies with healthcare professionals (HCPs; n = 9) and patients (n = 10), consultation with financial staff and testing, and resulted in objectives (Step 2). Guided by methods and applications (Step 3), the intervention was developed, tested and finalized (Step 4).

resultsThe needs assessment revealed the importance of behavioral change in HCPs, including changing attitude, self-efficacy, and social influence. For that purpose, a pathway and training sessions were developed. Testing these unveiled the need for practical tools and intervision. The final intervention comprises a care pathway as part of working routines, including screening, risk stratification, and tailored support. Practical tools, training sessions, and intervision for HCPs were developed.

conclusionsCombining IM with action research principles resulted in a generic stay-at-work intervention in clinical care via behavioral change in HCPs. A generic care pathway, practical tools, training sessions, and intervision were developed. More specific alignment to specific patient groups is possible. To implement the intervention in another hospital, the local context, (financial) resources, and the national legislation should be considered.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelChronic DiseaseHumansNeeds AssessmentQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID35596102
PMCPMC9668761
OpenAlexW4281250522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.