ArticleMolecular biology reports2022
Evaluation of potential of miR-8073 and miR-642 as diagnostic markers in pancreatic cancer.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic assessment for potential endogenous normalizers for microRNA analysis in fecal samples.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical Value of Circulating miRNA in Diagnosis, Prognosis, Screening and Monitoring Therapy of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma-A Review of the Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic cancer is a cancer with an insidious course. Since disease is often diagnosed at advanced stages, clinical outcome is impaired. Thus identification of biomarkers for this malignancy has importance in enhancement of patients' survival. METHODS AND
resultsIn the current study, we assessed expression levels of miR-8073 and miR-642 in the circulation of 50 patients with pancreatic cancer and 50 controls. Plasma levels of miR-8073 and miR-642 were significantly higher in patients with pancreatic cancer compared with controls (P value < 0.0001 and P value = 0.0068, respectively). Plasma levels of miR-642 were inversely correlated with albumin levels (R=-0.28, P value = 0.049), WBC count (R=-0.35, P value = 0.01), as well as CRP level (R=-0.30, P value = 0.035). On the other hand, levels of this miRNA were positively correlated with lipase level (R = 0.29, P value = 0.042). Levels of miR-8073 were not correlated with any of the available parameters. Plasma levels of miR-8073 could separate patients with pancreatic cancer from controls with AUC, sensitivity and specificity values of 0.82, 0.77 and 0.78, respectively. miR-642 could differentiate these two groups with AUC, sensitivity and specificity values of 0.63, 0.58 and 0.78, respectively. Combination of these two parameters resulted in AUC, sensitivity and specificity values of 0.79, 0.77 and 0.78, respectively.
conclusionsTaken together, these two miRNAs are suggested as possible blood markers for pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35596051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.