Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35595865›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2022

Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with acute kidney injury in Japan in whom kidney biopsy was performed: a cross-sectional analysis of the Japan Renal Biopsy Registry (J‑RBR).

Norihito Moniwa, Marenao Tanaka, Hiroshi Sato, Akira Shimizu, Hitoshi Sugiyama, Hitoshi Yokoyama, Kazuhiko Tsuruya, Akinori Hashiguchi, Committee for Renal Biopsy and Disease Registry of the Japanese Society of Nephrology

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Norihito MoniwaDepartment of Nephrology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40, 1 jo 12 chome Maeda, Teine-ku, Sapporo, 006-8555, Japan. moniwa@sapmed.ac.jp.
Marenao TanakaDepartment of Cardiology, Nephrology and Metabolic Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroshi SatoDeparment of Internal Medicine, Sendai Hospital of East Japan Railway Company, Sendai, Japan.
Akira ShimizuDepartment of Analytic Human Pathology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitoshi SugiyamaDepartment of Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center and Department of Medical Care Work, Kawasaki College of Allied Health Professions, Okayama, Japan.
Hitoshi YokoyamaDepartment of Nephrology, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Japan.
Kazuhiko TsuruyaDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Akinori HashiguchiDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Committee for Renal Biopsy and Disease Registry of the Japanese Society of Nephrology
Sapporo Medical University · JPEast Japan Railway (Japan) · JPKanazawa Medical University · JPKawasaki College of Allied Health Professions · JPKeio University · JPNara Medical University · JPNippon Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a worldwide concern and it leads to a poor prognosis or end-stage kidney disease. The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics of patients with AKI in whom kidney biopsy was performed using data of the Japan Renal Biopsy Registry (J-RBR).

methodsWe screened 38,351 cases that were registered in the J-RBR from 2007 to 2018. We obtained data for 383 patients with AKI based on clinical diagnosis for analysis 1 and data for 714 patients with acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) based on pathological diagnosis for analysis 2.

resultsOf the cases screened, 383 patients with AKI (1.0%) were included in analysis 1. The main pathological diagnoses of AKI were AIN, ATN, chronic interstitial nephritis, nephro-sclerosis and crescentic glomerulonephritis. Of the cases screened, 589 patients with AIN (1.5%) and 110 patients with ATN (0.3%) were included in analysis 2. The main clinical diagnoses of AIN were AKI, rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN), chronic nephritic syndrome (CNS) and drug-induced nephropathy (DIN), whereas those of ATN were AKI, RPGN, DIN and CNS. ATN patients had a higher serum creatinine level than that of AIN patients.

conclusionOur results revealed that cases in the J-RBR included 1.0% of AKI cases based on clinical diagnosis and 1.5% and 0.3% of AIN and ATN cases, respectively, based on pathological diagnosis. In patients with suspected intrinsic AKI, kidney biopsy should be performed for diagnosis of the precise etiology and selection of appropriate treatment.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryGlomerulonephritisNephritisNephritis, InterstitialBiopsyCreatinineCross-Sectional StudiesHematuriaHumansJapanKidneyPrognosisProteinuriaRegistriesCreatinineAcute interstitial nephritis (AIN)Acute kidney injury (AKI)Acute tubular necrosis (ATN)

Identifiers

PMID35595865
OpenAlexW4281256616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.