Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35595829›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Deep learning network for integrated coil inhomogeneity correction and brain extraction of mixed MRI data.

Kai-Hsiang Chuang, Pei-Huan Wu, Zengmin Li, Kang-Hsing Fan, Jun-Cheng Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kai-Hsiang ChuangQueensland Brain Institute and Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Pei-Huan WuDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, and Graduate Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 33302, Taiwan.
Zengmin LiQueensland Brain Institute and Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Kang-Hsing FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Jun-Cheng WengDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, and Graduate Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 33302, Taiwan. jcweng@mail.cgu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been widely used to acquire structural and functional information about the brain. In a group- or voxel-wise analysis, it is essential to correct the bias field of the radiofrequency coil and to extract the brain for accurate registration to the brain template. Although automatic methods have been developed, manual editing is still required, particularly for echo-planar imaging (EPI) due to its lower spatial resolution and larger geometric distortion. The needs of user interventions slow down data processing and lead to variable results between operators. Deep learning networks have been successfully used for automatic postprocessing. However, most networks are only designed for a specific processing and/or single image contrast (e.g., spin-echo or gradient-echo). This limitation markedly restricts the application and generalization of deep learning tools. To address these limitations, we developed a deep learning network based on the generative adversarial net (GAN) to automatically correct coil inhomogeneity and extract the brain from both spin- and gradient-echo EPI without user intervention. Using various quantitative indices, we show that this method achieved high similarity to the reference target and performed consistently across datasets acquired from rodents. These results highlight the potential of deep networks to integrate different postprocessing methods and adapt to different image contrasts. The use of the same network to process multimodality data would be a critical step toward a fully automatic postprocessing pipeline that could facilitate the analysis of large datasets with high consistency.

Indexed as

Deep LearningBrainEcho-Planar ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID35595829
PMCPMC9123199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.