Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35595821›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Prognostic modeling of predictive maintenance with survival analysis for mobile work equipment.

Zhen Yang, Juho Kanniainen, Tomi Krogerus, Frank Emmert-Streib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhen YangFaculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Computing Sciences, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 10, Tampere, 33720, Finland.
Juho KanniainenFaculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Computing Sciences, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 10, Tampere, 33720, Finland.
Tomi KrogerusCargotec Oyj, Ruskontie 55, Tampere, 33710, Finland.
Frank Emmert-StreibPredictive Society and Data Analytics Lab, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 10, Tampere, 33720, Finland. frank.emmert-streib@tuni.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years there is a data surge of industrial and business data. This posses opportunities and challenges at the same time because the wealth of information is usually buried in complex and frequently disconnected data sets. Predictive maintenance utilizes such data for developing prognostic and diagnostic models that allow the optimization of the life cycle of machine components. In this paper, we address the modeling of the prognostics of machine components from mobile work equipment. Specifically, we are estimating survival curves and hazard rates using parametric and non-parametric models to characterize time dependent failure probabilities of machine components. As a result, we find the presence of different types of censoring masking the presence of different populations that can cause severe problems for statistical estimators and the interpretations of results. Furthermore, we show that the obtained hazard functions for different machine components are complex and versatile and are best modeled via non-parametric estimators. However, notable exceptions for individual machine components can be found amenable for a Generalized-gamma and Weibull model.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalProbabilityPrognosisSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID35595821
PMCPMC9123218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.