Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35595794›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Evaluating machine learning classifiers for glaucoma referral decision support in primary care settings.

Omkar G Kaskar, Elaine Wells-Gray, David Fleischman, Landon Grace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI and Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Big data in visual field testing for glaucoma.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Omkar G KaskarNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Elaine Wells-GrayLumata Health, 1111 North Lee Ave, Oklahoma City, OK, 73103, USA.
David FleischmanUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Landon GraceNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. landon_grace@ncsu.edu.

Funding

AGE RELATED EYE DISEASE STUDY - COORDINATING CENTERN01EY002127 · NEI · EMMES CORPORATION · PI EDERERI, FRED · 1990 to 2000
$1.7M
Disposable, medication-integrated tactile and motion sensor for glaucoma therapy compliance improvementR41EY031632 · NEI · RETINAL CARE, INC. · PI GRACE, LANDON RAY · 2020 to 2020
$220k
NEI NIH HHS 1R41EY031632-01NEI NIH HHS N01 EY002127NEI NIH HHS R41 EY031632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several artificial intelligence algorithms have been proposed to help diagnose glaucoma by analyzing the functional and/or structural changes in the eye. These algorithms require carefully curated datasets with access to ocular images. In the current study, we have modeled and evaluated classifiers to predict self-reported glaucoma using a single, easily obtained ocular feature (intraocular pressure (IOP)) and non-ocular features (age, gender, race, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and comorbidities). The classifiers were trained on publicly available data of 3015 subjects without a glaucoma diagnosis at the time of enrollment. 337 subjects subsequently self-reported a glaucoma diagnosis in a span of 1-12 years after enrollment. The classifiers were evaluated on the ability to identify these subjects by only using their features recorded at the time of enrollment. Support vector machine, logistic regression, and adaptive boosting performed similarly on the dataset with F1 scores of 0.31, 0.30, and 0.28, respectively. Logistic regression had the highest sensitivity at 60% with a specificity of 69%. Predictive classifiers using primarily non-ocular features have the potential to be used for identifying suspected glaucoma in non-eye care settings, including primary care. Further research into finding additional features that improve the performance of predictive classifiers is warranted.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGlaucomaAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningPrimary Health CareReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID35595794
PMCPMC9122936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.